Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

Credit not to be reversed when inputs shown as scrap at lesser value and not written off

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Credit not to be reversed when inputs shown as scrap at lesser value and not written off
By: - Bimal jain
Cenvat Credit
Dated:- 28-2-2017

Dear Professional Colleague, Credit not to be reversed when inputs shown as scrap at lesser value and not written off We are sharing with you an important judgment of the Hon'ble CESTAT, Mumbai in the case of Autoline Vs. Commissioner of Cent .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ral Excise, Kolhapur [2017 (1) TMI 297 - CESTAT MUMBAI] on the following issue: Issue: Whether reversal of Cenvat credit is required on the inputs which are shown as scrap & value of such inputs was shown at lesser value and not written off in the books of account? Facts & Background: M/s Autoline ("the Appellant") is a manufacturer of automobile components for two, three and four wheelers. Th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Appellant has availed Cenvat credit paid on inputs, input services and capital goods. Certain inputs were shown in the books of the Appellant as scrap and lesser value was shown ("the Impugned inputs") but the said inputs were not written off and remained in the factory. However, the Department has alleged that as per Rule 3(5B) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 ("the Credit Rules"), if the asse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ssee written off the value of the inputs or made a provision for writing off, then, the Cenvat Credit on such inputs is required to be reversed. Accordingly, Cenvat credit in respect of the Impugned inputs has been denied. Thus, after the credit was denied by the Adjudicating Authority and the same order was upheld by the Commissioner, the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon'ble CESTAT, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Mumbai. Held: The Hon'ble CESTAT, Mumbai has held that though the impugned inputs was shown in the books of the Appellant as scrap and lesser value was shown, but it is not the case where the value of the inputs was written off. Therefore, Rule 3(5B) of the Credit Rules has no application. Further, so long the input is lying in the factory, credit cannot be asked to be reversed. However, it is n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eedless to say that as and when the inputs are cleared from the factory it will be liable for duty in terms of Rule 3(5B) of the Credit Rules. Relevant Provisions in the GST Regime - Our Comment: As per Section 17(4)(g) of the Model CGST/SGST Act, 2016, input tax credit shall not be available in respect of goods lost, stolen, destroyed, written off or disposed of by way of gift or free samples. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Thus, when the assessee actually writes off the goods in their books of account, then only, the GST credit on such inputs is required to be reversed in the GST Regime. This seems to be in consonance with the recent legal pronouncements wherein it has been held that unless the inputs are actually written off, the assessee is not required to reverse the Cenvat credit taken on such inputs. For e.g. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - * In the case of BCH Electric Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex., Faridabad-I [ 2016 (6) TMI 469 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH], it was held that "appellant has made a provision for written-off but inputs and components were not actually not written off by the appellant. Further, the appellant has used these inputs and components later on, in the manufacture of final goods, in that circumstances, as per pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ovision of Rule 3(5B) appellant is entitled to take Cenvat credit on these inputs and components, therefore, appellant is not required to reverse Cenvat credit on inputs/components for which they have made provision in the balance sheet." * Similarly, followed in the above 'Autoline' case. But question is still wide open to interpret whether provision made for written off or shown at lesser val .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ue for multiple reasons like treated as scrap, rejected inputs, etc., can be construed as actually written off unless such inputs are removed from the factory. Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavours. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us. Reply By Ganeshan Kalyani as = Dear Sir, nice article. It is informative. Sir, in my vi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ew provision for write off is not actually being written off. Thus the reversal as required u/r 3 (5B) may not require.Thanks. Dated: 28-2-2017
Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing by authors, experts, professionals .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates