9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 278X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Writ Petition has been issued on 19.12.2016. On that date, I had asked Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, to revert with the instructions. I had also indicated that, in case, instructions are received to resist the Writ Petition, counter affidavit will be filed before the next date of hearing. The matter was re-notified on 12.01.2017. Interim direction against the precipitative action wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 10.11.2016. However, as would be evident upon the perusal of the impugned order dated 14.11.2016 that, it was passed without having regard to the second reply filed by the petitioner. But fault, if any, can be found on this score only if it is established that the second reply dated 10.11.2016 was served on the respondent. 2.3. Furthermore, after the impugned order was passed, a representatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the petitioner that, while the demand notice dated 14.11.2016, bears the signature of the respondent, the Assessment Order has not been signed by the said Officer. Learned counsel, thus, says that the impugned Assessment Order should be set aside on this ground alone. 4. Mr.K.Venkatesh, learned Government Advocate, who appears for the respondent, submits he cannot but accept that the absence of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ssing Officer on 17.02.2017 at 11.00a.m. 10. The authorised representative of the petitioner will carry all the original declarations and documents, if not already filed to the hearing as indicated above. 11. The respondent / Assessing Officer, after affording an opportunity to the authorised representative of the petitioner, will pass a fresh order. 12. Needless to say, the order passed will b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
