2017 (3) TMI 708

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hok Jindal The appellant has filed these appeals against the impugned order holding that the order of review by the Committee was within time as the date of review started from the date of receipt of adjudication order. 2. This is the second round of litigation. In the earlier round of litigation, this Tribunal remanded back to the adjudicating authority to examine the issue of limitation whethe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the adjudication order. In remand proceedings, the date of communication of adjudication order has been changed deliberately. In that circumstance, the impugned orders are to be set aside. 4. On the other hand, learned AR brought on record saying that the date of communication of the order and submits that if the date of communication of adjudication order is taken into consideration then the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 6.2008 23.7.2008 (vi) 09/2008-09 27.05.2008 911/2008 Dt.19.9.08 27.05.2008 10.06.2008 9.9.2008 19.9.2008 7. On going through the chart, I find that in the earlier round of litigation, the dates of communication of the adjudication order was written as 24.3.2008, 27.09.2007, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008 and 27.05.2008. Later on in the impugned proceedings the date of receipt has been .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X