TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 854X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... from that date expired on 9.3.2016. The present application having come to the Registry on 6.4.2016 that is time-barred - ROM dismissed - decided against applicant. - E/ROM/40318/2016 in E/69/2004 - MISC ORDER No.40555/2016 - Dated:- 22-12-2016 - Shri D.N. Panda, Judicial Member Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Technical Member PRESENT: Shri R. Parthasarathy, Consultant For the Applicant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ough the order sought to be rectified afresh to make a review of the decision. Contemplation of law is only to rectify apparent mistake. This is the proposition of law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Honda Siel Power Products Ltd. Vs CIT, Delhi - 2008 (221) ELT 11 (SC). In view of the above, we do not find any discoverable mistake patent on the face of the order of the Tribunal fo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... escribed following circumstances to ascertain the date on which an order comes into effect: (a) If the order is dictated on the Bench, the date of dictation will be the date of final order; (b) If the order is reserved, the date of final order will be the date on which the order is pronounced; (c) Where gist of the decision is pronounced without the detailed order, the last para of t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
