2016 (6) TMI 1189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nment Pleader, for the respondents JUDGMENT This writ appeal arises from the judgment in W.P.(C No.19471 of 2016. The appellant filed the writ petition challenging Ext.P5 order passed under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act demanding an amount of Rs. 92,20,520/- towards tax due for the assessment year 2014-2015 along with Rs. 21,20,720/- towards interest. The ground on which the challenge was made w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... On receipt of Ext.P1, the appellant submitted Ext.P4 reply to the first respondent requesting the details based on which Ext.P1 notice was issued. She also sought enlargement of time for submitting the reply. However, stating that the details relied on against the appellant are those obtained from the KVATIS uploaded by the dealer herself, the first respondent passed Ext.P5 order under Section 25 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t and this refusal is justified by the learned Government Pleader on the ground that these details should be obtained from the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and not from the first respondent. According to us, even if that is the stand of the first respondent, the first respondent should have given such an information to the appellant, so that the appellant could have approached the Indian Oil Corpor .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X