Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (5) TMI 937

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ₹ 67,15,010/- already paid by the assessee and appropriated in the impugned order. The break-up of the balance amount of ₹ 2,46,49,943/- is as follows: Demand Category Period ₹ 24,11,025/- Management Consultancy (excluding development cost) 2005-06 to 2008-09 ₹ 17,15,138/- Management Consultancy (development cost) January 2005 to March 2006 ₹ 1,69,91,194/- Manpower Recruitment or Supply Agency 2005-06 to 2008-09 ₹ 28,68,873/- Airport service .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s company whose services were assigned to the appellant. The relationship between the appellant and such employees was that of master-servant and hence the salaries and perks paid to the employees were not exigible to service tax. The learned counsel has further pointed out that a part (Rs. 15,29,906/-) of the above demand under manpower recruitment or supply agency service is for the period prior to enactment of Section 66A and the same is unenforceable. In respect of the balance demand of ₹ 1,54,61,288/-, the learned counsel has claimed strong prima facie case on merits in the aforesaid manner. 3.1 We have heard the learned Additional Commissioner (AR) also who has reiterated the relevant findings of the adjudicating authority. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... er the head airport service and for the period from 2005-06 to 2008-09. He has submitted that this demand is on the total amount of tender fees and pre-award costs collected by the appellant from unsuccessful bidders who had filed prequalification tenders for various developmental works for the airport. As per the tender conditions, the tender fees and pre-award costs were not refundable. These amounts were retained by the appellant. The impugned demand is on the total amount so retained. The learned counsel has further argued that the above fees and costs were brought to levy of service tax under the head airport service . According to him, such fees and costs were not collected as consideration for any such service and hence the demand .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates