Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India. Com TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Home Acts / Rules Notifications Circulars Tariff/ ITC HSN Forms Case Laws Manuals Short Notes Articles News Highlights
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Bhopal

2017 (4) TMI 803 - CESTAT NEW DELHI

CENVAT credit - input service - GTA service for transportation of goods from the factory of the appellant to the buyers - whether appellant is liable to pay interest for the intervening period or not and in the facts and circumstances of the case, penalty is imposable on the appellant or not? - Held that: - the Cenvat credit account was lying unutilized and therefore, interest is not payable by the appellant - With regard to penalty, from April, 2010, there was an amendment in the Rules that the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Ashok Jindal, Member (J) Shri Ravinder Singh, Advocate, for the Appellant. Shri S. Nunthuk, AR, for the Respondent. ORDER The appellant is in appeal against the impugned order wherein Cenvat credit on GTA service for transportation of goods from the factory of the appellant to the buyers has been denied by the lower authorities. 2. The facts of the case are that during the period March, 2010 to December, 2010, the appellant paid the service tax on goods transported to the buyers and availed .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned Counsel for the appellant submits that as the appellant was having sufficient balance in their Cenvat credit account, and Cenvat credit was availed on account of outward transportation agency service, was not having been utilized and therefore, interest is not payable by the appellant in the light of Hon ble Karnataka High Court s decision in Bill Forge Pvt. Ltd. [2012 (26) S.T.R. 204 (Kar.) = 2012 (279) E.L.T. 209 (Kar.)]. He further submits that as the appellant was in doubt whether they a .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

appellant. It is also submitted on behalf of the Revenue that as the appellant was aware of the Rule that they are not entitled to Cenvat credit on transportation agency service, therefore, penalty is imposable on the appellant. 5. Heard the parties. Considered the submissions. 6. The short issue involved in the matter is that appellant is liable to pay interest for the intervening period or not and in the facts and circumstances of the case, penalty is imposable on the appellant or n .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

Forum
what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version