Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2017 (4) TMI 1213

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the respondents had availed inadmissible cenvat credit of Rs. 40,30,335/- of Service Tax on services rendered by various building contractors for construction of building, boundary wall etc. of the factory not being used directly or indirectly for the manufacture of excisable goods. The respondents submitted certain documents on 20.03.2008 and the scrutiny of the submitted records revealed that:- (i) The invoice issued by M/s Landmark Build Well Pvt Ltd on which the cenvat credit has been availed, had been amended without signature of the amending authority and the cenvat credit had been availed on amended value. (ii) It was not clear whether the amended value was the gross value or value of services only. In fact the invoices do not cont .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Faridabad. He also remanded the matter relating to services of renting premises to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner for verification as the respondents in their appeal have specifically stated that they had not availed the cenvat credit of service tax paid in respect of rented premises. 2.5 Aggrieved by the order of Commissioner (Appeals), Revenue has filed this appeal. The respondents have also filed their cross objections. 3. Ld. AR appearing for the Revenue submits that input service credit is inadmissible as construction of building and boundary wall of the factory are not being used directly or indirectly for the manufacture of excisable goods. He further submits that the invoices issued by M/s Landmark Build Well Pvt Ltd ha .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 2 (Tri.- Ahmd.). 6.3 On the other issues raised by the Revenue, I find that the invoice no.576 has already been submitted before Commissioner (Appeals) and would be verified when the documentary verification is done pursuant to the order of Commissioner (Appeals). It is not clear from the show cause notice as to which invoice of M/s Landmark Build Well Pvt Ltd is being referred to as there are nine invoices issued by this company. I also find that other allegations pertaining to input service mentioned in para 3 of the show cause notice are not specific and since the first appellate authority has already ordered verification of the original documents evidencing payment of service tax in accordance with law, the ground raised by Revenue is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates