New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
CGST - Acts + GST Rates GST Ntf. GST Forms GST - Manual GST - FAQ State GST Acts SGST Ntf. I. Tax Manual
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

M/s Mitutoyo South Asia Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC New Delhi

Refund claim - rejection on the ground that the appellant filed two claims in one month - The main defence of the appellant is that it is a principle of law that substantial benefit given by the Statute cannot be denied on procedural grounds. When the fact of payment of VAT by the appellant is not in dispute they are entitled to refund of Additional Duty of Customs - Held that: - when Section 27 of the Customs Act has not put any specific bar on number of claims to be filed, the refund procedure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

t the Order-in-Appeal No. 503/2014 dated 23.4.2014 whereunder the rejection of the refund claim on the ground that the appellant filed two claims in one month, has been sustained. 2. Both sides represented by ld. Counsels, Shri S.S. Dabas and Ms. Kanu Verma Kumar have been heard. 3. The Revenue s main objection against sanction of the refund claim is that para 4.2 of Circular No. 6/2008-Cus dated 28.4.2008, where under only one claim is to be filed in one month, has been contravened. The main de .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Gupta Vs. CC - 2013 (318) ELT 167 (Tri.-Mum.). Tribunal in the case of Devki Nandan J. Gupta (supra) observes as under: 5. The original authority as well as the Commissioner (Appeals) have contended that the appellant has violated the condition laid down in the para 4.2 of the C.B.E. & C. Board Circular, which is reproduced below :- 4.2. It is also clarified that only a single claim against a particular Bill of Entry should be permitted to be filed within the maximum time period of one year. .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

le refund claim in respect of one importer in a month irrespective of the number of Bills of Entry (B/Es) processed by the respective Commissionerate. From the careful reading of the above para, it is clear that though the procedure is prescribed that there would be a single refund claim in respect of one importer in a month irrespective of the number of Bills of Entry. However, in the present case that the first claim was filed on 6-5-2013 for the quantity of goods sold. However the quantity co .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

rom the date of challan towards payment of duty, both the payments were made on 26-5-2012 and 1-6-2012. If the appellant would have filed both the refund claim in the month of Jun 2013 then statutory time limit of one would have expired and they become ineligible for this claim. In the Board Circular also consciously, understanding this situation, clarified that the exception is provided in case if the one year period is going to expire. It is very obvious that it is not intention of the Board C .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version