TMI Blog2017 (5) TMI 1187X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... eal dismissed - decided against appellant. - E/ROA/92154/17, E/EH/92139/17 in E/402/09 - M/87218-87219/17/EB - Dated:- 25-4-2017 - Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) And Shri Raju, Member (Technical) Appellant - Represented by None Respondent - Represented by Shri V.K. Agarwal, Addl. Commr. (AR) ORDER Per: Ramesh Nair The background of the case is that this Tribunal v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er dated 11.10.2013. Against the Hon'ble High Court order, the applicant filed a SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 22.01.2014. The same was dismissed by the Hon'ble Apex Court. The applicant also filed a review petition No.1282 of 2014 in the Hon'ble Supreme Court, which was dismissed on 09.7.2014. Now the applicant filed this ROA as well as EH application to consider it on t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... licant has no option except to deposit 25% of duty for hearing the appeal. Therefore, there is no reason to restore the appeal on the face of above sequence of the proceedings. Therefore, the application for restoration of appeal is liable to be dismissed. 3. We have carefully considered the submissions made by both the sides. We find that as per the Hon'ble High Court order, the applicant ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
