TMI Blog2017 (6) TMI 688X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Circular, there is no urgency at this stage to consider the plea of the Petitioner. It would have to await the outcome of the appeals filed by the Union of India in the Supreme Court against the judgment of this Court in Mangli Impex Ltd. v. Union of India [2016 (5) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - It will be open to the Petitioner to draw the attention of the adjudicating authority to the Master Ci ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mediately due to certain specified reasons and adjudication is to be kept in abeyance. One of the categories mentioned therein is: in which the Department has gone in appeal to the appropriate authority. 2. In the present case, it is not in dispute that against the judgment of this Court in Mangli Impex Ltd. v. Union of India 2016 (335) ELT 605(Del), which was a batch of cases, which include ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of India(supra). Mr. Sanghi states that this notification is also under challenge in the present writ petition. 4. The Court is of the view that since, admittedly, the Petitioner s SCN would fall within the ambit of Call Book Cases under para 9.3 of the Master Circular, there is no urgency at this stage to consider the plea of the Petitioner. It would have to await the outcome of the appeals ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ill be open to the Petitioner to draw the attention of the adjudicating authority to the Master Circular dated 10th March, 2017 and pray for keeping the adjudication proceedings in abeyance in terms thereof. 6. As regards the challenge to the Notification dated 4th May 2016 is concerned, the Petitioner is permitted to revive the challenge depending on the outcome of the appeals filed by the Uni ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
