Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1971 (8) TMI 49

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... assessment years 1960-61 and 1961-62 at Rs. 2,33,744 and Rs. 63,405 respectively. The assessee-company did not declare any dividend for either of these two relevant previous years and the Income-tax Officer was of the view that the company came within the purview of section 23A. He issued notice to the assessee-company to show cause why additional super-tax under the provisions of section 23A should not be levied on the assessee for these two years. In reply to the notice, the assessee contended that looking to the past losses and the smallness of profit in the two years, it was unreasonable to declare any dividend. The Income-tax Officer held that in view of the distributable profits available for the two years and the failure of the assessee to declare any dividend, additional super-tax was leviable. On appeal against this decision of the Income-tax Officer, the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, after examining the book results for the two-years and after taking into account the assessee's objections, confirmed the orders of the Income-tax Officer. Thereafter, the matter was taken in further appeal before the Tribunal and it was urged before the Tribunal on behalf of the assesse .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of a private company by the members thereof for the purpose of evading higher taxation. To act under this section the Income-tax Officer has to be satisfied that the dividends distributed by the company during the prescribed period are less than the statutory percentage, i.e., 60 per cent. of the assessable income of the company of the previous year less the amount of income-tax and super-tax payable by the company in respect thereof. Unless there is a deficiency in the statutory percentage, the Income-tax Officer has no jurisdiction to take further action thereunder. If that condition is complied with, he shall make an order declaring that the undistributed portion of the assessable income less the said taxes shall be deemed to have been distributed as dividends amongst the shareholders. But before doing so, a duty is cast on him to satisfy himself that, having regard to the losses incurred by the company in earlier years or 'the smallness of the profit made', the payment of a dividend or a larger dividend than that declared would be reasonable. The argument mainly centred on this part of the section. Would the satisfaction of the Income-tax Officer depend only on the two circums .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by a company on forward hedging contracts in one particular year and the company not declaring the dividend in spite of the full amount available to it in view of the fact that the hedging contracts were entered into only to safeguard against future loss and there was loss of more than that amount in exports in the next year, before the date of declaration of dividend. In that case before the Bombay High Court, the company concerned had made a profit of Rs. 1,94,116 on forward hedging contracts in 1950 ; and though there was a balance of profit of Rs 93,703, it distributed only Rs. 8,000 as dividend for the year on the ground that hedging contracts were entered into only to safeguard against future loss and there was loss of more than that amount in exports in the next year, before the date of declaration of dividend. The departmental authorities being of the view that the only two matters to be considered in making an order under section 23A were losses of previous years and smallness of profits of the current year, made an order under section 23A. It was held by the High Court : "That the expression 'having regard to' used in section 23A does not limit the enquiry only to the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... loss or liability. There may be circumstances which may warrant a reserve against possible liability which will have to be excluded in the computation of commercial profits for the purpose of section 23A. In that case it was held by the High Court that in order to determine the commercial profits of the assessee-company whose business included furnishing guarantees for debts borrowed by subsidiary companies, a liability reserve of companies, which had gone into liquidation, had to be excluded. At page 381 of the report, Veeraswami J., delivering the judgment of the court, observed: "The question always in such case is whether the payment of dividend or a larger dividend than that declared would be unreasonable. This question will have to be eventually decided in the light of commercial considerations and not on any technical view of the provisions made for liabilities likely to be enforced against the assessee. We cannot say that, in the particular circumstance we have mentioned, the board of directors conducted themselves without reference to business considerations or were unreasonable in setting apart the reserve to meet the possible liability. In our opinion, it is not necessa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In applying these tests of reasonableness, it cannot be said that the businessman errs on the side of unreasonableness if in the light of anticipated loss in subsequent years, he decides to set apart a certain sum from the current year's profit to meet future liabilities. The question which has been formulated for our consideration by the Tribunal mentions whether losses suffered by the assessee-company in subsequent years are to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the applicability of section 23A. It is only while applying the standard of reasonableness that the losses suffered by the assessee-company in subsequent years may in a particular case serve as evidence of the reasonableness of the anticipations which the board of directors had made at the time when they decided to declare a particular dividend or decided not to declare any dividend at all for the year in question. The losses suffered in subsequent years by themselves are not to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the applicability of section 23A; but while judging whether the decision of the company or the board of directors of the company to declare a particular dividend or not to decl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates