GST Helpdesk   Subscription   Demo   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (7) TMI 437 - CESTAT HYDERABAD

2017 (7) TMI 437 - CESTAT HYDERABAD - TMI - Clandestine manufacture and removal - Sponge iron - natural justice - Held that: - the appellants were seeking the cross examination of various persons and the same having not been granted to them, the impugned order is unsustainable on this ground only - there is violation of principles of natural justice and the impugned order needs to be set aside - matter remitted back to the adjudicating authority to reconsider the issue afresh after following the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

st the Order-in- Original C. Ex Nos.11/2006 dated 29.12.2006. 2. The brief relevant facts that arise for consideration are appellant M/s SM Industries were manufacturing sponge iron for which they procure iron ore and coal which are required in equal quantity as the production process of the SM Industries is coal based. The department officials on a visit to the appellants factory and office premises and resuming various records, after recording statements of several persons held a view that app .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ority after following due process of law and granting cross examination of only 5 people confirmed demands raised along with interest and also imposed penalties. 3. Ld. Counsel took us through the entire records and submitted in detail the issue involved. He was vehemently arguing that the adjudicating authority has relied upon the statements of those persons who were been produced for cross examination. Hence, the conclusion reached by the adjudicating authority by relying upon the statements o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

stine manufacturing and clearing of the goods have been established by the adjudicating authority in the impugned order. 5. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides and perusal of records, we find that the entire issue is regarding the appreciation of the evidences in respect of the allegation of clandestine removal of sponge iron by the main appellant and imposing of penalties on other appellants for aiding/assisting such an activity. We find from the records that the adju .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

s were sent to them on 01.06.2006, 27.06.2006, 21.07.2006 and 29.08.2006 giving different opportunities to appear for cross examination on 27.06.06, 18.07.06, 21.08.06 and 14.09.06. In all these instances, these witnesses requested for another date and finally, they have not attended for the said cross examinations on any of these dates. The statements of Shri S. Vijayanand & Shri R. Vijay Kumar can be relied upon. Further, the statements of the following 5 persons viz., Shri. Nathurmal Gour .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the case of Jindal Drugs Pvt Ltd., Vs UOI [2016 (340) ELT 67 (P&H)]. In the said judgment, their Lordships have considered the provisions of Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944 in detail and in paragraph 16 to 25 held how the provisions will apply in respect of the adjudication procedure in the Central Excise matters. We respectfully reproduce the same. 16. If none of the circumstances contemplated by clause (a) of Section 9D(1) exists, clause (b) of Section 9D(1) comes into operatio .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

statement should be admitted in evidence in the interests of justice. 17. There is no justification for jettisoning this procedure, statutorily prescribed by plenary Parliamentary legislation for admitting, into evidence, a statement recorded before the Gazetted Central Excise Officer, which does not suffer from the handicaps contemplated by clause (a) of Section 9D(1) of the Act. The use of the word shall in Section 9D(1), makes it clear that, the provisions contemplated in the sub-section are .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lsion in order to extract confessional statements. It is obviously in order to neutralize this possibility that, before admitting such a statement in evidence, clause (b) of Section 9D(1) mandates that the evidence of the witness has to be recorded before the adjudicating authority, as, in such an atmosphere, there would be no occasion for any trepidation on the part of the witness concerned. 19. Clearly, therefore, the stage of relevance, in adjudication proceedings, of the statement, recorded .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nt recorded during investigation/inquiry before the Gazetted Central Excise Officer, unless and until he can legitimately invoke clause (a) of Section 9D(1). In all other cases, if he wants to rely on the said statement as relevant, for proving the truth of the contents thereof, he has to first admit the statement in evidence in accordance with clause (b) of Section 9D(1). For this, he has to summon the person who had made the statement, examine him as witness before him in the adjudication proc .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

examined as a witness before the adjudicating authority, and (ii) the adjudicating authority arrives at a conclusion, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the statement deserves to be admitted in evidence, that the question of offering the witness to the assessee, for cross-examination, can arise. 22. Clearly, if this procedure, which is statutorily prescribed by plenary Parliamentary legislation, is not followed, it has to be regarded, that the Revenue has given up the said witnesses, s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y witnesses in adjudication, their statements cannot be considered as evidence." 24. That adjudicating authorities are bound by the general principles of evidence, stands affirmed in the judgment of the Supreme Court in C.C. v. Bussa Overseas Properties Ltd., 2007 (216) E.L.T. 659 (S.C.), which upheld the decision of the Tribunal in Bussa Overseas Properties Ltd. v C.C., 2001 (137) E.L.T. 637 (T). 25. In the light of the above, respondent no. 2 is directed to adjudicate the show cause notic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

n the makers of the said statements, so that the Revenue would examine them in chief, before the adjudicating authority, i.e., before Respondent No. 2. (ii) A copy of the said record of examination-in-chief, by the Revenue, of the makers of any of the statements on which the Revenue chooses to rely, would have to be made available to the assessee, i.e., to Ambika and Jay Ambey in this case. (iii) Statements recorded during investigation, under Section 14 of the Act, whose makers are not examined .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

roceedings, takes place, and a copy thereof is made available to the assessee, it would be open to the assessee to seek permission to cross-examine the persons who have made the said statements, should it choose to do so. In case any such request is made by the assessee, it would be incumbent on the adjudicating authority, i.e., on Respondent No. 2 to allow the said request, as it is trite and well-settled position in law that statements recorded behind the back of an assessee cannot be relied u .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version