Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News What's New Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Bhagvati Banquets And Hotels Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Reopening of assessment - reason to believe - disallowance u/s 35D and Section 14A - Held that:- What is apparent on seeing the records of the present case is that during the scrutiny assessment, the claims of the petitioner were thoroughly scrutinized and an Assessment Order was accordingly passed on 21.12.2010. From the communications on record which were exchanged inter se between the assessee and the Revenue, it is apparent that on being satisfied with the questions that were answered by the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ange of Opinion’. Accordingly, the notice dated 26.03.2013 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the consequential Assessment Order dated 27.01.2014 passed by the respondents is quashed and set aside. - Decided in favour of assessee. - SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 of 2014 - Dated:- 6-7-2017 - MR. AKIL KURESHI AND MR. BIREN VAISHNAV, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr Sn Divatia, Advocate For The Respondent : Mrs Mauna M Bhatt, Advocate ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE BIREN .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

1.03.2009 and second revised return on 17.02.2010, showing an income of ₹ 13,88,33,290/2.2 2.2 The return of the petitioner - assessee was selected for scrutiny after regular assessment held under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Pursuant to such scrutiny held, an Assessment Order was issued on 21.12.2010 for the Assessment Year in question i.e. 20082009. The Revenue issued notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act on 26.03.2013. 2.3 By a letter dated 25.04.2013, the petiti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

19.01.2009 declaring total income of ₹ 14,40,91,411/, which was revised on 31.3.2009 by retaining same total income. The return was again revised on 17.2.2010 declaring total income at ₹ 13,88,33,290/The case was completed under scrutiny manner on 21.12.2010 determining total income at ₹ 15,09,03,666/- 1 On verification of the case records, it is seen that assessee has charged the profit and loss account with IPO expense written off to the tune of ₹ 1,17,14,943/being one .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of the Act for the reason that, at the time of incurring expenses on issue of public offer of shares, assessee is already engaged in hotel (accomodation and catering) business at Ahmedabad. Thus, assessee had already commenced business at the time of public issue of shares. Thus, the expense incurred was for the purpose of expansion of its existing business and was therefore, not covered by Section 35D(1)(i) of the Act. Secondly, assessee s business is in the nature of providing service (hospit .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

section 14A of the I.T.Act, 1961, expense incurred for earning income which does not form part of total income shall be disallowed. The disallowance shall be made in terms of Rule 8D. On verification of the case records, it is seen that an amount of ₹ 8,71,250/being 0.5 percent of the average investments in accordance with Rule 8D(2)(ii) was disallowed in respect of exempt dividend income of ₹ 97,28,550/However, proportionate interest expense of ₹ 18,45,734/[ ₹ 98,03,000 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

CIT [2006] 157 Taxman 1(SC). The method for determining disallowable expenses was introduced vide Rule 8D w.e.f. A.Y. 2008-09. In view of these facts, the disallowance of expenses under section 14A of the Act required to be determined in terms of Rule 8D prescribed in the Income Tax Rules. It has led to escapement of ₹ 18,45,734/- In light of the above, I am of the view that this is a fit case for income escaping assessment under Sec. 147 of the I.T.Act. Therefore, the undersigned has reas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

y proceed with the assessment but no final order be passed. However before the interim relief was granted, an Assessment Order dated 27.01.2014 was passed. The interim relief therefore was modified restraining the respondents from carrying out coercive action. Therefore even the Assessment Order dated 27.01.2014 is also a subject matter of challenge in this petition. 3 The notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was issued within a period of four years, for the Assessment Year 2008 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the Assessing Authority it was also observed that such expenses were incurred for setting up a new hotel at Surat. According to the authority, such IPO expenses incurred by the assessee was in the nature of capital expenditure and did not qualify for deduction under the head as income from profits and gains of business or profession . According to the Revenue, such expenses did not qualify for deduction under Section 35D of the Act in view of the fact that when such expenses were incurred the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

i) was not available to the assessee. (iii) The third ground on which it was thought fit for the Revenue to reopen the assessment was that the authority was of the opinion that an amount of ₹ 8,71,250/being 0.5 percent of the average investments was disallowed in respect of exempt dividend income of ₹ 97,28,550/. According to the Revenue, the proportionate interest expense of ₹ 18,45,734/was not disallowed in accordance with Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Income Tax Rules. According to .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uch scrutiny the authorities were communicated explanations and details relating to various points including the point in issue for which exercise of reopening the reassessment is undertaken, it was not open for the Revenue to reopen the assessment in exercise of powers under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. 4.1 According to Mr Divatia, learned advocate for the petitioner, as is evident from reading the reasons supplied by the Revenue, the first two issues on which the Revenue thought it fit t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e of reference to the scrutiny assessment, the assessee had in detail pointed out the working of the deduction under Section 35D. Calculation is shown in ledger accounts of the preliminary expenses, proof of stamp duty and filing fees etc were produced during the course of scrutiny. (B) By communication dated 29.11.2010, once again details of calculation for the amount of deduction that have been worked out under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act were produced before the Revenue. A specific note .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ad gone for IPO during the relevant Assessment Year to startup its new ambitious 5 Star Hotel Project at Surat. The main agenda behind the IPO was to setup the new Hotel and expand the business to better levels. Since the All the IPO and enhancement of equity capital related statutory fees paid to ministry of Corporate Affairs or any other Statuary liabilities, were directly correlated with new project at Surat, hence such expenses should not be disallowed u/s.35D as amortisation of preliminary .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

how that an amount of ₹ 8,70,520/was offered as administrative charges at the rate of 0.50% of the average investments for tax. Calculation were so categorically pointed out in compliance of Rule 8D(2) (ii) of the Income Tax Rules. 5 In other words, it was the contention of the learned advocate for the petitioner that once the exercise of scrutiny assessment is undertaken under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act and once having been satisfied with the documents presented on the questions .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

of disallowance under Section 14A of he Act. Relevant paragraph of the Assessment Order are reproduced hereunder: 5 Expenses for increase in Authorized Share Capital 5.1 It is seen that the authorized share capital of the assessee company has increased from ₹ 30Crores to ₹ 50 crores. Accordingly, the assessee was requested to explain where the expenses for increase in authorized share capital recorded in its books of account. In this regard, the assessee vide letter dated 14.12.2010 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

nature of expenses specified in 35D(2). Even otherwise, relying on the jurisdictional High Court decision reported in M/s. Vareli Textiles Ltd 284 ITR 238(Guj), which has followed the decision of Supreme Court reported in 225 ITR 798 (SC) in Brooke Bond India vs CIT holding the said expenditure as capital in nature and is not allowable as expenditure u/s. 37(1). Accordingly, a sum of ₹ 2,10,000/is disallowed and added to the income. Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) is separately being initiated for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

.14A. 6 Mrs Mauna Bhatt, learned advocate for the Revenue has opposed the petitioner and contended that the powers under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act were exercised bonafide. According to Mrs Mauna Bhatt, there was enough tangible material before the authorities to come to a conclusion or reason to believe that the income for the Assessment Year in question has escaped the assessment. According to Mrs Bhatt, once the exercise of reopening the assessment was undertaken under Section 148 of t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

parties, that we need to decide whether the Revenue had exercised the power to reopen the assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act within the parameters of law. 8 As has been reproduced herein above, primarily, the reasons for reopening of the assessment or reasons to believe , or which the authorities have thought it fit to reassess the income on the ground that the income has escaped the assessment has been essentially on two grounds: (i) That the assessee was not entitled to deducti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

/was not included for disallowance, and therefore, as such the income to that extent had led to escapement of income. 9 Question that needs to be answered is that if during the exercise of scrutiny and consequential assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act when there was an extensive exchange of communications and production of records, which ultimately led to the satisfaction of the authority for passing of order under Section 143(3) and concluding the issues at hand, would i .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

king out of the assessee s deductions under Section 35D of the Income Tax Act. A note on liability of deduction under Section 35D explaining how the figure of 1,17,14,943/towards 1/5th written off expenses for the IPO expenses was extensively explained in such communications. Even on the question of section 14A of the Income Tax Act, in the communications, particularly, in communication dated 14.12.2010, the assessee had in compliance of Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Income Tax Rules explained how Secti .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

lowance under Section 14A amounting to ₹ 8,71,250/The Assessment Order further records that considering the details, the disallowance offered by the assessee during the assessment proceedings is accepted and disallowance of ₹ 8,71,250/is made u/s.14A. 12 Perusal of the reasons to believe indicate that the exercise of reopening the assessment under Section 148 is on the same grounds, and therefore, it is nothing but an exercise carried out which tantamounts to change of opinion . 13 W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

. The Delhi High Court observed as under: 13 It is, therefore, clear from the aforesaid position that: (1) Reassessment proceedings can be validly initiated in case return of income is processed under Section 143(1) and no scrutiny assessment is undertaken. In such cases there is no change of opinion. (2) Reassessment proceedings will be invalid in case the assessment order itself records that the issue was raised and is decided in favour of the assessee. Reassessment proceedings in the said cas .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

sment will be invalid because the Assessing Officer had formed an opinion in the original assessment, though he had not recorded his reasons. 14 In the observation of the High Court, the reassessment proceedings would be invalid in a case where the Assessment Order itself records that the issue was raised and was decided in favour of the assessee. In the opinion of the Court, in such a case, the proceedings would be hit by principle of change of opinion . As is evident from the facts of the case .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

is Court considering the question of reassessment under Section 148 of the Act under similar circumstances found that, during the course of original assessment, the Assessing Officer had raised several queries with respect to certain claims. Detailed replies were furnished by the assessee. The Court on facts found that when an Assessment Order is framed and the claim of the assessee is examined and found to have been in compliance of the provisions, mere change of opinion would not give a window .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

uld be treated in the final order of assessment, is an issue on which the assessee would have no control whatsoever. Whether the Assessing Officer allows such a claim, rejects such a claim or partially allows and partially rejects the claim, are all options available with the Assessing Officer, over which the assessee beyond trying to persuade the Assessing Officer, would have no control whatsoever. Therefore, whileframing the assessment, allowing the claim fully or partially, in what manner the .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

us material, numerous exemptions and deductions. If the Assessing Officer is burdened with the responsibilityof giving reasons for several claims so made and accepted by him, it would even otherwise cast an unreasonable expectation which within the short frame of time available under law would be too much to expect him to carry. Irrespective of this, in a given case, if the Assessing Officer on his own for reasons best known to him, chooses not to assign reasons for not rejecting the claim of an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

hooses not to assign his reasons in the assessment order would not alter this position.It may be a nonreasoned order but not of acceptance of a claim without formation of opinion. Any other view would give arbitrarypowers to the Assessing Officer. 43. We are, therefore, of the opinion that in a situation where the Assessing Officer during scrutiny assessment, notices a claim of exemption, deduction or such like made by the assessee, having some prima facie doubt raises queries, asking the assess .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

d under section 143(3) of the Act was sought to be reopened within a period of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. The case concerned assessment year 1993-94 and therefore, the amended section 147 of the Act was applicable. On certain claims of the assessee which were not rejected by the Assessing Officer in the scrutiny assessment, the court held that in cases where the Assessing Officer has not made an assessment of any item of income chargeable to tax while passing the as .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

he Act, power to make assessment or reassessment within four years would be attracted even in cases where there has been complete disclosure of all material facts. 16 Judgment of the Gujarat Power Corporation (Supra), has been followed in the case of Spunpipe and Construction Co. vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, reported in 362 ITR 559, this Court also considered the question as to whether it was open for the Assessing Authority to reopen the assessment on change of opinion , considerin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

g to the Assessing Officer in terms of section 28 of the Act, it was the petitioners business income. His second contention was that in any case the deduction under section 54G of the Act was not allowable. The petitioner filed detailed replies on 21.12.2010 and on 22.12.2010. Insuch replies, he tried to persuade the Assessing Officer on both counts, that is, on the question of treating the income as capital gain and simultaneously justifying thepetitioners claim for deduction under section 54G .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e as a business income instead of capital gain but gave detailed reasons why petitioners further claim for deduction under section 54G of the Act should be rejected. 12. From the above, it clearly emerges that the Assessing Officer had a full innings of complete scrutiny of the question and the manner in which the income should be taxed. He initially held a belief that such income was a business income of the assessee. This is precisely why he called upon the assessee to explain. The assessee ga .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

  ↓     Latest Happening     ↓  

Forum: GST return filing software online | Easy GST compliance management

Forum: Input credit of gst paid on urd

Forum: 3B mistake

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Forum: Input tax credit

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

Forum: GST on Notional rent

Forum: GST ON SALES PROMOTION

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.

Highlight: Genuineness of labour wages expenses, embroidery charges, fabrication expenses etc. - getting work done through small workmen who do not have any permanent place of residence - disallowance of ad hoc expenditure deleted.

Highlight: Project import - Since the goods were never used for the purpose for which it was imported, the actual user condition has been violated - Redemption fine and penalty imposed.

Highlight: Penalty u/s 112 (a) - CHA - Lack of due diligence and failure to take more precautions can not, by itself, bring in penal consequences

Highlight: Import of services - GST - The fact that those services were received outside India will not change the fact that the services have been paid for by the beneficiary appellant, who is located in India. - Demand confirmed.

Notification: SEZ for IT/ITES at Madhurwada Village, Visakhapatnam District in the State of Andhra Pradesh - denotified.

Highlight: Merely because payment is received in Indian rupee, it cannot be said that payment against export has not been received in convertible foreign exchange.

Highlight: Merely vehicle numbers was not mentioned on the invoices cannot be the reason to deny Cenvat Credit

Highlight: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 - Circular

Circular: Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 120A of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017

News: Auction for Sale (Re-issue) of Government Stocks

Article: TDS APPLICABILITY ON GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS UNDER GST (Under Section 51 of the CGST Act, 2017)

News: Manmohan takes potshots at note ban, 'hasty' rollout of GST

News: GST on petrol, diesel requires wider discussion: Nitish

Article: WHEN CAN ONE TAKE ITC FOR RCM CASES?

Notification: TDS liability under Section 51 of CGST, 2017 come into force w.e.f. 18-9-2017 - Persons liable to deduct TDS from payment made or credited to the supplier of taxable goods or services specified

Notification: Central Goods and Services Tax (Seventh Amendment) Rules, 2017

Notification: Seeks to extend the last date for filing the return in FORM GSTR-3B for the months of August to December, 2017

Circular: Filing of Special Leave Petition against Orders of Hon'ble High Courts staying Collection of Tax under GST- reg.

Highlight: Exemption u/s 54F - LTCCG - once entire net consideration is invested, the absence of completion certificate cannot be a ground to deny the benefit of deduction.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version