TMI Blog2017 (8) TMI 136X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al Service Committee). Sri.Thomas Abraham, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner submits that cost will be paid by tomorrow. - Crl.R.P.No.588 of 2017 - - - Dated:- 7-6-2017 - MR. ALEXANDER THOMAS, J. For the Petitioner : Advs.Sri.Thomas Abraham Sri.Anil K.Nair Smt.Merciamma Mathew Sri.Aswin.P.John For The Respondents : Advs.Sri.D.Sajeev Sri.K.R.Haridas Smt.Ligey Antony, Public Prosecutor Sri.Justin Mathew ORDER The petitioner is the accused for the offence under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, in S.T.No.44/2012 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-VIII, Thiruvananthapuram, instituted on the basis of a complaint filed by R-1 herein. The trial court as per the impugned jud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submit on the basis of instructions from their respective parties that the entire disputes between the parties in relation to the dishonoured cheque in question have been resolved and that the complainant has already received the full amount of ₹ 69,500/- covered by the impugned judgments (which is the cheque amount) from the accused in full and final settlement of all liabilities in respect of the cheque involved in this case and that the complainant has no further grievance in relation to this case and further that both parties have filed a joint compromise petition as Crl.M.A.No.2948/2017 for compounding the offence in this case. The said joint compromise petition reads as follows: PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 147 OF THE NEG ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Dated this the 7th day of June, 2017. sd/- Petitioner/Revision Petitioner/Accused sd/- Counsel for the petitioner/Revision Petitioner/Accused sd/- 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/Complainant sd/- D.Sajeev (S.840)(K/561/87) sd/- K.R.Haridas (H.101)(K/561/87) sd/- Ligeiy Antony (L.51)(K/510/93) Counsel for the 1st Respondent/1st Respondent/Complainant In the light of the above submission made on behalf of the parties as well as on a perusal of the joint compromise application for compounding of the offence, it is ordered that the impugned judgments of both the courts below will stand set aside and the offence under Sec.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
