Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Bawarlal Jain, Sundar Singh Versus Commissioner of Customs (Exports) , Chennai

2017 (8) TMI 984 - CESTAT CHENNAI

Jurisdiction - power of DRI to issue SCN - Held that: - the DRI is not a competent authority - I set aside the impugned orders and remand the matter to the original authority to decide the matter keeping in view the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of M/s Mangali Impex Ltd., M/s Pace International And Others Versus Union of India And Others [2016 (5) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT] - appeal allowed by way of remand. - C/110/2006 & C/117/2006 - 41787-41788/2017 - Dated:- 24-8-2017 - M .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

se of Mangli Impex Vs. UOI by their order dated 03.05.2016 has observed that the DRI is not competent to issue show-cause notice. Hence, the request is being made to set aside the present proceedings where the show-cause notice was issued by the DRI. 3. On the other hand, Ld. A.R for the Department has justified the order passed by Commissioner of Customs and made a request to decide the matter on merit. 4. We have heard both the parties and gone through the material available on record. 5. From .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e Hon ble Supreme Court (Supra), the provisions of section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 were amended with effect from 08.04.2011 vide Finance Act, 2011. 7. It is also noticed that in order to overcome the situation created by the judgment of Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayed Ali (supra), Notification No. 44/2011-Cus (NT), dated July 6, 2011 was issued by the CBEC, assigning the functions of the proper officer to various officers (including Additional Director General, DRI) mentioned in t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

officers with retrospective effect. 9. Later on, i.e. for the period subsequent to the amendment, the matter i.e. the DRI officers having the proper jurisdiction to issue the SCN or not had came up before the Hon ble Delhi High Court in the case of Mangali Impex Vs. Union of India [2016 (335) ELT 605 (Del.)], and the High Court inter alia, held that even the new inserted section 28 (11) does not empower either the officers of DRI or the DGCEI to issue the SCN or adjudicate for the period prior t .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version