2017 (9) TMI 551

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Damle, Assistant Commissioner (AR)   for Respondent ORDER The appellant is in appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. PUN-SVTAX-000-APP-166 to 171-16-17 dated 29.07.2016 whereunder part refund claim amounting to Rs. 33,93,671/- has been rejected. 2.   Both sides represented by learned Counsels, Ms. Nikki Poddar Chartered Accountant for the appellant and Shri M. P. Damle for the R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... quarterly basis only, is to be taken from the date of the end of the quarter, during which export of services took place. If it is so, the appellant has filed the claim within time limit of one year, which is the prescribed time limit in the law of Central Excise read with Rule 5 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and the Notification No. 27/2012-C.E.(N.T.) dated 18th June 2012 as applicable to the appe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sioner has rightly deducted the value of 10 invoices pertaining the period prior to 1.4.2012 from export turnover as well as total turnover for the period April-June 2012. As regard limitation, when in the Notification issued under Rule 5 it is a condition that the assessee has to file refund only once in a quarter. Accordingly, he is not allowed to file refund before quarter is completed, in that .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X