Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

CCE, Ludhiana Versus Rail Tech.

CENVAT credit - job-work - respondents have taken the credit of same duty twice - N/N. 214/86-CE - Held that: - the issue whether the principal manufacturer can taken Cenvat Credit on the inputs contained in the goods received from the Job workers on which duty has been paid, is no longer res integra, and decided in the case of M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Versus CCE & ST. - Meerut-I [2014 (3) TMI 203 - CESTAT NEW DELHI], where it was held that The intermediate products made out of inputs .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r the Respondent ORDER Per : Devender Singh The Revenue is in appeal against the impugned order. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the respondents are manufacturers of Railway parts falling under Chapter 86 of Central Excise Tariff. They took the Cenvat Credit of Central Excise Duty paid on Polycarbonate Sheet, which is one of the raw materials for their final products. The inputs were procured from M/s GE India Industries Pvt. Ltd. (M/s GEI), a registered dealer. The inputs were sent dire .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the duty on the inputs. Revenue felt that the respondents had wrongly taken Cenvat Credit on the strength of invoices of M/s GSC to the extent duty charged on the value of the material supplied by the respondents to M/s GSC. Thus the respondents had taken the credit of inputs twice. Accordingly, a show cause notice was issued to the appellant for recovery of duty ₹ 23,96,494/- and proposing equal amount of penalty along with interest. The case was adjudicated by adjudicating authority, who .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

acting as independent manufacturer, the assessee should have supplied the raw material on invoice after payment/reversal of duty. He contended that the assessee has taken the double benefit of Cenvat Credit of duty on the Polycarbonate Sheets. He referred to the judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of International Auto Ltd. Vs. CCE, Bihar 2005 (183) ELT 239 (SC). He also relied on the following judgments:- 1. CCE, Ahmedabad I Vs. Rohan Dyes & Intermediaries Ltd. 2012 (284) ELT 48 .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ication. He relied on the following case laws:- 1. M/s Thermax Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vadodara-I 2015 (326) ELT 369 (Tri. Ahmd.). 2. M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. CCE & St, Meerut-I 2014 (300) ELT 442 (Tri.-Del) 3. Aries Dyechem Industries Vs. CCE, Ahmedabad 2010 (257) ELT 113 (Tri. Ahmd.) 4. CCE, Ahmedabad-I Vs. Rohan Dyes & Intermediated Ltd. 2012 (284) ELT 484 (Guj.) affirmed by the Hon ble High Court. 5. CCE, Aurangabad Vs. Somaiya Organo Chem 2007 (213) ELT 130 (Tri. Mumbai). 5. Hear .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ication No. 214/86-CE dt. 25.03.1986. I find that the issue whether the principal manufacturer can taken Cenvat Credit on the inputs contained in the goods received from the Job workers on which duty has been paid, is no longer res integra. In a similar situation, in the case of M/s M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. Vs. CCE & St, Meerut-I (supra) this Tribunal held as below:- 5. We have considered the submissions from both the sides and perused the records. 6. The appellant, had been receivi .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

r being partially processed are sent to a job-worker for further processing, testing, repair, re-conditioning Tor for the manufacture of intermediate goods necessary for the manufacture of final products or any other purpose, and it is established from the records, challans or memos or any other document produced by the manufacturer or provider of output service taking the Cenvat credit that the goods are received back in the factory within one hundred and eight days of their being sent to a job .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inputs, can send those inputs to his job worker for further processing, testing, repair, reconditioning, etc. or for manufacture of intermediate goods necessary for the manufacture of final products or for any other purpose, provided the processed inputs or intermediate products are returned back within a period of 180 days. There is no condition that for availing the facility of this Rule, the job worker should avail full duty exemption under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. There is no dispute th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ts of their own used by the said job workers for manufacture of the intermediate products. The Department seeks to deny the Cenvat credit of the duty on the intermediate product paid by the job workers on the ground that on the same inputs, Cenvat credit cannot be availed twice - first at the time of receipt the inputs by the Appellant in their factory from the input manufacturers and second time in respect of duty paid on intermediates goods made out of input supplied by Appellant upon receivin .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

work basis for the principal manufacturer, in terms of the judgment of the Apex Court in case of Ujagar Prints v. Union of India, reported in 1989 (39) E.L.T. 493 (S.C.), they would be required to pay duty on the cost of input plus job charges including the cost of their own inputs used in manufacture. This is what the job workers have done in the present case. Moreover when the inputs, in question, have suffered twice, first in the hand of input manufacturers from whom the Appellant had procure .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

inputs and just because the Appellant have availed Cenvat credit in respect of the inputs, the Cenvat credit of duty, if any paid on the intermediate products by the job workers, cannot be denied to the principal manufactures. 8. In view of the above discussion, the impugned order is not sustainable. The same is set aside and the appeal as well as stay application are allowed. The above decision has been followed by this Tribunal in the case of M/s Thermax Ltd. Vs. CCE, Vadodara-I (supra). I als .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ned SDR that the appellants have derived dual benefit. We are not able to see any dual benefit in this case. Based on the several matters which have come up before us, in this case if the job worker was to avail procedure of Notification No. 214/86 and clear the goods manufactured by him without paying duty, Department would have taken a stand that he has cleared the goods without payment of duty and therefore the materials which he has added by purchasing in the market would not be eligible for .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Forum: GST on RCM on rent in a unregistered state

Forum: COMPOSITION SCHEME

Forum: Input Tax Credit - Reg

Forum: GST Invoice

Article: Websites of Government Departments need lot of improvement. We are noticing detoriations in them for example, case of website of ITAT.

Highlight: Levy of additions tax u/s 115O on distribution of dividend - shares of its profits declared as distributable among the shareholders is not impressed with the character of the profit from which it reaches the hands of the shareholder - not to be bifurcated as agriculture and non-agriculture dividend - SC

Highlight: Rate of GST on old and scrap buses - 28% or 18% - at such initial tender process initiated by the Respondents-KSRTC, the present petitions filed by the petitioners are premature and misconceived and do not require any interference by this Court at this stage. - HC

Forum: Rent a cab operator

Highlight: In view of amendment made u/s 132A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by Finance Act of 2017, the 'reason to believe' or 'reason to suspect', as the case may be, shall not be disclosed to any person or any authority or the Appellate Tribunal, SC dismissed the appeal of the assessee

Highlight: Validity of Assessment Order - period of limitation u/s 153 (2A) is applicable even if the entire order was not set aside but matter was remanded back for for limited aspects with directions - HC

News: Note ban was a shake-up, achieved its main objectives

Notification: Amendments in the notification No.5/2017- Integrated Tax (Rate) dated the 28th June, 2017.

Highlight: Levying interest u/s 234C - interest is to be charged on the returned income and not on assessed income.

Highlight: Accrual of income - sale of right to develop and sell incentive FSI under LOI - till the conditions of LOI are fulfilled transfer is not complete and income does not accrue to the assessee

Highlight: TPA - determination of ALP - TP adjustment by applying Bright Line Test (BLT) is not sustainable on protective basis having no statutory mandate.

Highlight: Safeguard Duty - Advance License Scheme - as there is no exemption from safeguard duty leviable under Section 8C, which is imposed on the goods imported from China, the importer has to pay safeguard duty

Highlight: Manufacture - process of cutting of waste plastic container - Such plastic containers before and after cutting are nothing but waste / scrap - Not a manufacturing activity as no new product emerges.

News: NITI Aayog and Govt. of Assam organizes workshop on health sector reforms in Guwahati; launches SATH- Sustainable Action for Transforming Human Capital

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 5/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding restriction of refund on corduroy fabrics

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst exemptions

Forum: GSTR 3B Rectification

Notification: seeks to exempt Skimmed milk powder, or concentrated milk

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 2/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to GST council decisions regarding GST exemptions.

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- central tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates

Notification: Seeks to amend notification no. 1/2017- integrated tax(rate) dated 28.06.2017 to give effect to gst council decisions regarding gst rates.

News: Notification Issued For GST Actionable Claim On Branded Food Products

Highlight: Classification printed computer stationary/manifold Business Forms - to be classified under Chapter Heading 4820.00 or under Chapter Heading 4901.90 - items like A4 sheets, advertisement and job card to be classified under Chapter 49

Article: RCM Applicability to persons not liable to get registered us 23(1)

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

News: GST Refund - Blockage of Working Capital of Exporters - earlier also there was a normal blockage of funds for a period of 5-6 months at least

News: Clarification about Transition Credit - ₹ 1.27 lakh crore of credit of Central Excise and Service Tax was lying as closing balance as on 30th June, 2017 - claim of credit of ₹ 65,000 crore is not unexpected

Article: 20 Things You must know about E Way Bills in GST Law

Article: MISTAKES IN DRAFTING

Highlight: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg. - Circular

Highlight: The definition of "subsidiary company" or "subsidiary" u/s 2(87) of the Companies Act, 2013 shall come into force w.e.f. 20-9-2017

Highlight: Central Government notified the All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017 - Notification

Notification: All Industry Rates of Duty Drawback Schedule w.e.f. 1.10.2017

Circular: Investment by Foreign Portfolio Investors in Corporate Debt Securities Review

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under UTGST Act

Notification: Exemptions on supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under IGST Act

Notification: List of Exempted supply of services under the CGST Act

Notification: Rates for supply of services under CGST Act

Highlight: Acceptance of deposits by companies from its members - conditions relaxed in case of Specified IFSC Public company and a private company - Rule 3 amended

Notification: Rate of exchange of conversion of the foreign currency with effect from 8th September, 2017

News: Tax Payers Advised To Confirm Identities Of Income Tax Search Authorities

Notification: Amendment in Appendix 3 (SCOMET items) to Schedule- 2 of ITC (HS) Classification of Export and Import Items 2012

Notification: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017

Circular: The Customs and Central Excise Duties Drawback Rules, 2017 and All Industry Rates (AIRs) of Drawback related changes -reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version