Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Forum Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database More...
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

The Commissioner of Income Tax-15 Versus Haresh D. Mehta

Unexplained unsecured loans - addition u/s 68 - ITAT deleted addition - Held that:- Tribunal, in concurring with the First Appellate Authority, found that the Assessing Officer had made addition under Section 68 without any reasonable basis. FAA has analyzed the transaction with each and every creditor and assigned reasons as to why the loans have to be treated as genuine. The assessee has produced details like copy of PAN card, copy of return of income, balance sheet with all the annexures and .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer, but had also admitted of giving loan. There was nothing suspicious or doubtful in the version of these persons. That is why the order of the First Appellate Authority was upheld. It did not suffer from any legal infirmity. Tribunal did not agree with the Assessing Officer but with the First Appellate Authority because there was overwhelming documentary evidence on record to support the conclusion of the First Appellate Authority. - Decided against revenue - Addition toward .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ccount payee cheques. If there was further doubt about the transactions, the Assessing Officer was free to make inquiries with the Regional Transport Office. Tribunal agreed with the First Appellate Authority in holding that mere nonattendance or mere non service without anything more could not be reason enough to sustain the addition. It is in these circumstances, that the First Appellate Authority has rightly stepped in according to the Tribunal. No substantial question of law. - Decided again .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

late Authority [Commissioner of Income Tax(A)26Mumbai]. The Tribunal, in dismissing the Appeal, according to Mr. Malhotra, by it's order dated 7th May, 2014, has not appreciated the factual materials in their proper perspective and consistent with the provisions of law. 3. The two questions proposed, according to Mr. Malhotra, are substantial questions of law. On the first question, he would submit that the assessee disclosed that he is a civil contractor. He is in the business of lifting an .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

Assessing Officer towards transportation charges. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee paid ₹ 2.82 crores towards such charges. He issued notices under Section 133(6) of the Income Tax Act to 12 parties for further verification about the genuineness of the payment. The notices issued by the Assessing Officer were received back unserved. The parties were not available on the addresses given by the assessee. The Assessing Officer, therefore, proceeded on the basis that there is no .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

al Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The 12 parties, whose details were set out in the proceedings before the First Appellate Authority, together with other material, therefore, enabled him to conclude that the transportation expenditure had to be allowed. 6. Mr. Malhotra would submit that the Tribunal has rendered a cryptic finding and without application of mind to the fact that the vehicles and the parties who have been engaged on such contract basis have no nexus, nor it could be established. I .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

was shown but it was brought on record by the Revenue that there was no income which could be said to be generated by the six creditors. The Tribunal erroneously and wrongfully relied on some income and from diamond trading. The First Appellate Authority had, in reversing the order of the Assessing Officer, relied on some figures which have been provided. The addition was made to the extent of ₹ 54,00,000/as unexplained cash credit. The capacity or genuineness of the parties to undertake s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

a loan. 8. For all these reasons, Mr. Malhotra would submit that the Appeal raises substantial questions of law. 9. On the other hand, Mr. Jasani appearing on behalf of the assessee supports the findings in the impugned order. He would submit that the concurrent finding of fact is based on the record and there is no perversity established and proved. Similarly, the order of the Tribunal is not vitiated by any error of law apparent on the face of record. Therefore, the Appeal be dismissed. 10. W .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng Officer, except three, there is no justification or explanation for the six remaining persons/creditors. The Assessing Officer held that the assessee has not proved the capacity or genuineness of the parties to undertake such huge loan transactions and due to various discrepancies in the papers produced before him, he has reached the above conclusion. He has reached the conclusion that the parties are not capable of giving such loans. 12. What we find is that such order of the Assessing Offic .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ng. The Assessing Officer has simply presumed that the genuineness of the transaction has not been proved. The First Appellate Authority took up for consideration the issue and party-wise. In the first instance, he took up the case of M/s. Mukti Exports. It found that the Assessing Officer's finding is not correct because the loan amount is generated from the business activities and duly reflected in the accounts. Therefore, it was for the Assessing officer to establish beyond doubt that M/s .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity of the party. The party is identified and together with that, there is proof of its financial capacity. 14. Similarly, the First Appellate Authority found that there are sufficient materials even in cases of loans appearing in the name of Samir Jayantilal Shah, Shantiben S. Shah and Charmi A. Mehta. Like Mukti Exports, even these parties are assessed to Income Tax. Their documents together with that of one Vijay D. Shah have been referred in paragraph nos. 17.2, 17.3 and 17.4 of the C.I.T.&# .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

First Appellate Authority has analyzed the transaction with each and every creditor and assigned reasons as to why the loans have to be treated as genuine. The assessee has produced details like copy of PAN card, copy of return of income, balance sheet with all the annexures and copy of bank accounts before the Assessing Officer. If there was any doubt, the Assessing Officer should have made further investigation. Once the initial burden was discharged, the Assessing officer had then to find ou .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ity was upheld. It did not suffer from any legal infirmity. 16. We also agree with the Tribunal, and particularly when it proceeded to analyze the transactions and the issue in an overall manner. It did not agree with the Assessing Officer but with the First Appellate Authority because there was overwhelming documentary evidence on record to support the conclusion of the First Appellate Authority. 17. Hence, the second question proposed by the Revenue cannot be termed as a substantial question o .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e First Appellate Authority, therefore, should not have reversed the conclusion of the Assessing Officer, particularly when it did not take note of the fact that the assessee did not produce even the basic information such as vehicle numbers, name of drivers and the route over which these vehicles were utilized. 19. The First Appellate Authority, as also the Tribunal, found that there are decisive factors. The actual performance of transportation work, lifting of waste, proper TDS payment throug .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

urce, but the addition was made only because there was no service of the notices on the parties or though the parties were attempted to be served, the notices were not accepted. Merely because the parties were not physically present before the Assessing Officer, such an addition could not have been made is the concurrent conclusion. 21. The First Appellate Authority approached the matter from the angle that it was the responsibility of the Assessing Officer to investigate from the bank accounts, .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     Latest Happenings     ↓  

Highlight: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

News: Notification regarding GST rate for branded cereal, pulses and flour

Highlight: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

Highlight: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Non-payment of service tax - maintenance and repair charges - appellants had knowingly and deliberately shown the repair charges as job work charges to mislead about their taxability - demand confirmed.

Highlight: BAS - execution of the project of smart card for vehicle registration – implementing the SOC-VRC project - The fact that the Government has outsourced some part of the work and paid certain consideration for such outsourced work, does not make the activity subject to service tax.

Forum: Input tax credit

Forum: Cess paid instead of SGST

Forum: Excise duty credit on finished stock at additional place of business.

Circular: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg.

News: Cabinet approves Extension of time period of the Scheme "Special Industry Initiative for J&K" (Sll J&K) - Udaan

Highlight: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg. - Trade Notice

Highlight: Amendments in Hand Book of Procedures 2015-20 –reg. - Various amendments are made in Chapter-4 of Hand Book of Procedures 2015-2020.

Forum: GST rates on mobile recharge business

Circular: Constitution of National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) under GST-reg.

Forum: import purchase

Highlight: Sharing of expenses - BAS - promotion of business of group companies - sharing of expenditure for common facilities cannot be treated as service by one to another in such arrangement.

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Forum: 3B mistake

Article: Credit of unsold stock [Section 140(3)] - Actual Credit as well as Notional Credit - Part-I - GST Transitional provisions

Circular: Certain Clarifications sought on Construction Services provided in the Real Estate Sector – reg.

News: Anti-dumping duty on import of bus/truck tyres from China

News: Fast-track GST refund, else ₹ 65K cr may be stuck: Exporters

Highlight: It is open to the Settlement Commission to use best judgment in arrival of the figure. Nonetheless it has to explain the manner in which the best judgment figure has been arrived at by the Settlement Commission - HC

Highlight: Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - advances given to societies - in the absence of legal right of the assessee in the said society the amount advanced cannot be treated as deemed income.

Highlight: When electrical installations are treated as plant and machinery the depreciation has to be allowed @ 25% as per provisions contained u/s 32

TMI Note: Capital Gain - transfer of right in the land or transfer of land itself - addition u/s 50C - Harassment to the honest tax payers

Highlight: Option to avail composition scheme under GST by electronically filing an intimation in FORM GST CMP-02 and FORM GST ITC-03 upto 30-9-2017 - See Rule 3(3A)

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply for the purposes of computing exemption u/s 11 to 13.

Highlight: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability - CBDT issues draft notification

TMI Note: Certain ICDS provisions are inconsistent with judicial precedents. Whether these judicial precedents would prevail over ICDS.

Highlight: Provisions of ICDS shall prevail w.e.f. AY 2017-18 to the transactional issues dealt therein over earlier judicial pronouncements.

Notification: Levy of anti dumping duty on New/unused pneumatic radial tyres with or without tubes and/or flap of rubber (including tubeless tyres) having normal rim dia code above 16 originating in, or exported from China PR

News: Voluntary Reporting of Estimated Current Income and Advance Tax Liability

TMI Note: In case of conflict between ICDS and other specific provisions of the Income-tax rules, 1962 governing taxation of income like rules 9A, 9B etc. of the Rules, which provisions shall prevail.

TMI Note: Does ICDS apply to computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) u/s 115JB of the Act or Alternate Minimum Tax (AMT) u/s 115JC of the Act.

TMI Note: Where a term has not been defined under ICDS, nor under the Act, but has different interpretations given to it by the courts in tax cases, and in ICAI Accounting Standards, which interpretation would prevail while interpreting ICDS.

TMI Note: Whether the provisions of ICDS apply to a non-resident who claims the benefit of a double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA).

TMI Note: In case any of the ICDS provisions is contrary to a circular or press release issued by the CBDT, which would prevail over the other.

TMI Note: ICDS-I requires disclosure of significant accounting policies and other ICDS requires specific disclosures. Where is the taxpayer required to make such disclosures specified in ICDS.

Notification: Income Computation and Disclosure Standards (ICDS) - New ICDS to be effective from AY 2017-18

News: RBI Reference Rate for US $

Highlight: GST - Detention of goods under transport - discrepancy in documents - the statutory provisions provide a mechanism for adjudication following detention of goods including for the provisional release thereof pending adjudication - HC

Highlight: Reassessment - first few paragraphs of the assessment order dealt with objections and disposed of accordingly - Unfortunately, the manner in which the AO has decided the issue is wholly unsustainable in law - HC

Highlight: Business expenditure u/s 37 - liquidated damage - breach of contract terms - Expenditure was not incurred for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law - cannot be disallowed - HC

Highlight: Valuation - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - managing participation of clients in certain mela, fairs, promotional activities etc. - They are liable to service tax on the gross amount received - They cannot restrict their tax liability to only agency commission

Highlight: TDS liability - ITAT confirmed the liability - We do not see how it is possible for us to uphold the order of the Tribunal and when it purports to decide two Appeals of the Revenue by single paragraph conclusion - HC

Highlight: Reopening of assessment - sufficiency of material available with the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment - bogus purchases - seller refused to respond - notice would not be interfered with - HC

Highlight: Exemption u/s 11 - education activities - transport and hostel facilities surplus cannot be considered as business income of the assessee society

News: Draft Notification for insertion of new rule 39A in the Income-tax Rules, 1962 – comments and suggestions-reg.



|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version