2017 (9) TMI 789

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .08.2008 to 08.04.2009 - It is obvious that the amount paid by the appellant was subsequent to the action initiated by the revenue and not prior to detection by the revenue. In these circumstances, no benefit in penalty in respect of the said amount can be granted - ROM application dismissed. - Application No. ST/ROM/92532/17 in Appeal No. ST/88188/13 - M/89077/17/SMB - Dated:- 17-8-2017 - Sh .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... take. 4. I have gone through the Rectification of Mistake application. I find that the applicants are seeking benefit of ₹ 12,18,423/- already paid by them against the confirmation of penalty of ₹ 34,55,247/-. Annexure B of the show-cause notice shows that the said duty of ₹ 12,18,423/- was paid during the period 28.08.2008 to 08.04.2009. It is seen from para 4.1 of the Tri .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X