Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2004 (6) TMI 17

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... present the appeal before the jurisdictional High Court exercising jurisdiction over the Tribunal, which has passed the order appealed against - - - - - Dated:- 10-6-2004 - Judge(s) : D. K. SETH., R. N. SINHA. JUDGMENT D.K. Seth J. - This is an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, for condonation of delay. A preliminary objection has been raised by Mr. J.P. Khaitan that the order was passed by the learned Tribunal at Bombay subject to the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court. The assessment for the concerned previous year reached its finality in another State over which the Tribunal and the High Court of that State had jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of this court cannot be stretched to the Tribunal in another St .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ok into the maintainability of the appeal before this court even before it embarks upon deciding the question of condonation of delay. The application under section 5 has been filed in connection with an appeal under section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, before this High Court against an order passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai. Section 260A provides that an appeal shall lie to the High Court from every order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal. Section 269 defines High Court for the purpose of Chapter XX to mean "in relation to any State the High Court for that State". Therefore, when the Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai disposes of the appeal, the appeal under section 260A in Chapter XX would lie to the High Court a .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he view taken in A.B.C. India Ltd. [2002] 255 ITR 108 (Cal). Therefore, following the ratio laid down therein, we hold that this court cannot assume jurisdiction in respect of the matters reaching finality before the Tribunal in another State subject to the jurisdiction of the High Court of that State. In the circumstances, we grant liberty to the assessee to present the appeal before the jurisdictional High Court exercising jurisdiction over the Tribunal, which has passed the order appealed against within one month from date. The assessee shall be entitled to take aid of section 14 of the Limitation Act, if so advised. The advocate-on-record for the appellant may take back the memo of appeal and present the same before the appropriate .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates