2017 (10) TMI 38

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan For Respondents : Ms.R.Hemalatha ORDER Heard Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms.R.Hemalatha, learned Standing Panel Counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition for issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the first respondent to issue show cause notice with respect to the amount of customs duty pay .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e petitioner challenging the same in WP.No.707/2004 was dismissed. After setting out the above facts, the respondents stated that the question of issuance of show cause notice and commencing any adjudication proceedings does not arise and called upon the petitioner to pay the balance duty amount of Rs. 7,53,375/- along with interest of Rs. 59,07,544/- upto 21.08.2005 failing which, stated that act .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... interest has been raised by the petitioner. Nevertheless, since the writ petition has been pending from 2005, this Court of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity by submitting a reply to the notice dated 30.08.2005, in so far as it demands interest. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit their reply notice to the notice dated 30 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X