Subscription   Feedback   New User   Login      
Tax Management India .com
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Articles Highlights TMI Notes SMS News Newsletters Calendar Imp. Links Database Experts Contact us More....
Extracts
Home List
← Previous Next →

Income-tax Officer, Ward-3 (4) , Kolkata. Versus M/s. Keshan Logistic Pvt. Ltd.

2011 (12) TMI 679 - ITAT KOLKATA

ITA No. 202 (Kol) of 2011 - Dated:- 5-12-2011 - Sri N.Vijayakumaran, Judicial Member & Sri C.D. Rao, Accountant Member For the Appellant: Sri S.K. Roy For the Respondent: Sri Sunil Surana ORDER (N. Vijayakumaran), Judicial Member : This appeal by the department is directed against the order of the ld. C.I.T.(A)- I, Kolkata. The date of order is 23/11/2010 and the assessment year involved is 2006-07. The grounds raised in this appeal by the department read as under :- 1. Ld. CIT(A)-I has erre .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

the facts that assessee was liable to submit Form 15-I before the IT Authority as per Rule 29D to authenticate the claim. 3. On the facts & circumstances of the case the order of Ld CIT (A) is perverse, hence same may be set aside and order of A.O be restored. 2. The facts on the above issues are that the assessee is a transport operator. The assessee had no vehicles of its own and the business was being carried on by hiring the vehicles. According to the ld. A.O., the assessee paid freight .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

f the assessee. 3. On appeal, the ld. C.I.T.(A) deleted the addition of ₹ 26,76,722/- by observing as under :- 7.2. I have considered the facts narrated in the assessment order and submission of the Ld AR. In so far the applicability of the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) on the amount which was duly paid during the year and was not payable at the end of the year, I do not agree with the submissions of the appellant. The provisions of section 40(a)(ia) are linked with the provisions contai .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

(TDS) issued the notice to the assessee for the reason that in some of the cases PAN of the deductees were not mentioned in the return of TDS. The assessee replied as to why in some of the cases PAN s were not mentioned. From the reading of section 194C, it appears that once the assessee has received form No. 15-I he is debarred from deducting the tax. The submissions of the forms before the concerned authorities is not a condition precedent. Further more even if there are some defects in such .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

voked but for that reason disallowance cannot be made u/s 40(a)(ia). Therefore the addition was not called for. In view, of my above decision I decline to adjudicate on the alternative plea that there was no contract with the individual truck owners for carrying on of the goods in the transport business. The addition of ₹ 2676722/- is deleted. 4. At the time of hearing before us, the ld. Departmental Representative relied o the order of the ld. A.O. On the other hand, the learned counsel f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

ed the rival submissions and perused the material available on record including the precedents. We find that I.T.A.T., Kolkata Bench B vide its order dated 11/8/2011 in the case of Capital Transport Corpn. of India vs. ITO (supra), on identical facts and circumstances of the case and following the decision of I.T.A.T., Mumbai Bench dated 20/5/2011 in the case of Shri Vipin P. Mehta vs. ITO in ITA No.3317/Mum/2010, has directed to delete the addition made u/s. 40(a)(ia) of the Act. The relevant f .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

e time limit specified in subsection (2) to section 197A is distinct and separate and merely because there is a failure on the part of the assessee to submit the declarations to the income-tax department within the time limit, it cannot be said that the assessee did not have declarations with him at the time when he paid the interest to the payees. That would be a separate matter and separate proof and evidence is required to show that even when the assessee paid the interest, he did not have th .....

X X X X X X X

Extract - Part text only
Click here to Access Full Contents

X X X X X X X

 

 

 

 

 

what is new what is new
  ↓     bird's eye view     ↓  


|| Home || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Tariff || Forms || Case Laws || Manuals ||

|| About us || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || TMI Database || Members || Site Map ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.

Go to Mobile Version