2017 (10) TMI 861

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he Respondent : Dr.S.Seethalakshmi ORDER Heard Mr.B.Satish Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr.S.Seethalakshmi, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3. Though fourth respondent has been served and their name is printed in the cause list, none appears for them. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for a direction upon the third respondent, namely, the Deputy C .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r of M/s.Radha Decors, that since he has not participated in the proceedings, they are constrained to lift the suspension of clearance in respect of the consignment imported by the petitioner vide Bill of Entry No.7285334, dated 31.10.2016. This Bill of Entry is one of the Bill of Entries which is subject matter of the writ petition. Therefore, so far as this Bill of Entry No.7285334, dated 31.10. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... espondent to cause assessment and release the goods covered in the Bill of Entry No.6885665, dated 27.09.2016 and Bill of Entry No.7285334, dated 31.10.2016, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Since the detention has been at the instance of the department based on an objection raised by the fourth respondent and the department have lifted the order of su .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X