Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 

TMI Blog

Home List
← Previous Next →

2017 (11) TMI 384

not make any addition under section 43B of the I.T. Act. Later on, A.O. found certain mistakes in the original assessment order dated 22nd December, 2011 and one of the mistake was that no proof of payment in respect of Government duty covered under section 43B have been filed which was to be added under section 154 of I.T. Act to the income of the assessee. - The assessee filed reply before A.O. in the rectification proceedings under section 154 of the Act supported by copies of the challan to show that payment in question have been made to the department. It, therefore, appears that A.O. was satisfied with the explanation of assessee and that is why he did not make any amendment in the original assessment order dated 22nd December, 2 .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

Act after recording the reasons on dated 31st March, 2014. The assessee submitted before A.O. that return originally filed may be treated as return having filed in response to the notice under section 148 of the I.T. Act. The A.O. after considering the explanation of assessee made two additions of ₹ 4,19,585 on account of expenditure and made further addition of ₹ 6,50,000 on account of unexplained bank deposits. The total income was computed at ₹ 15,79,255. The assessee challenged both the additions before Ld. CIT(A). However, the appeal of assessee has been dismissed with the enhancement. 3. The assessee in the present appeal has challenged the initiation of re-assessment proceedings under section 147 of the I.T. Act an .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

assessee has no proof of payment in respect of Govt, duty u/s 438 amounting to ₹ 1,26,105/- and TDS of ₹ 45,143/- was deducted but not deposit in Govt. account. Hence, the same have been omitted to be disallowed u/s 43B. In view above income of above to the tune of Rs.l,26,105/- 1,71,248/- have escaped assessment, I therefore, have been to believe that the assessee is in default for non-payment of Govt. liabilities and hence income to the tune of ₹ 1,71,248/- has escaped assessment. Sd/- Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1) Gurgaon. 4.2. Originally, the assessment order under section 143(3) was passed vide order dated 22nd December, 2011. But the A.O. did not make any addition on account of duty under section 43B of the I.T. Act .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

e view that initiation of re-assessment proceedings is bad in law. The A.O. passed the original assessment order under section 143(3) of the I.T. Act and after examining the books of account and material on record, made various disallowances of the expenditure. The A.O. however, did not make any addition under section 43B of the I.T. Act. Later on, A.O. found certain mistakes in the original assessment order dated 22nd December, 2011 and one of the mistake was that no proof of payment in respect of Government duty covered under section 43B, amounting to ₹ 1,26,105 have been filed which was to be added under section 154 of I.T. Act to the income of the assessee. The assessee filed reply before A.O. in the rectification proceedings unde .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

s, the entire exercise made by the A.O. is without jurisdiction and is not sustainable in Law. The Hon ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Berger Paints India Limited vs. ACIT 322 ITR 369 held that the reassessment notice had been issued for virtually the same reason for which rectification proceedings had earlier been initiated but dropped. The A.O. had not disclosed any new material for reopening of the assessment. The notice for re-assessment was not valid and were liable to be quashed. 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, it is clear that when the A.O. issued notice for rectification under section 154 of the I.T. Act dated 7th March, 2014 and asked for the explanation of assessee with regard to the amount in question wheth .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||