TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 839X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ides for appointment of Central Government Officers as at Adjudicating Authority for holding an inquiry for the purpose of imposing any penalty against the respondent. As informed that after passing the impugned order no complaint against the respondent was filed against the order passed by the Adjudicating Authority who has imposed the penalty nor any inquiry is conducted in this regard under sec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... llate Authority imposed the penalty of ₹ 2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh and Fifty Thousand Only) on the respondent against all charges. The contentions of the respondent is that revision petition filed by the revisionist is not maintainable as there is no specific provision in the Act. As far as the penalty is concerned; the respondent has already deposited the penalty amount the details of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 5 14.03.2017 160124 50,000 2. The learned counsel for the appellant has referred the provision of section 19 of sub-section 6 of the Act and submits that the appellate Tribunal is empowered to examine the correctness of any order made by the Adjudicating Authority. For the purpose of convenience sub-section 6 of 19 re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rd under section 16 of the Act as provided under sub-section 6 of section 19. 4. Under these circumstances, I am of the view that there is a force in the submissions of learned counsel for the respondent that the revision petition filed by the appellant is not maintainable. The penalty amount as per impugned order has been deposited by the respondent. Thus I am inclined to interfere with the im ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
