TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 1494X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... otices for service of respondent company had not been submitted for endorsement on behalf of the petitioner, in terms of the order of this Court dated 26th February, 2016. It seems that the petitio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... petitioner on the first call either. Perusal of the record reveals that the notices for service of respondent company had not been submitted for endorsement on behalf of the petitioner, in terms of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
