2017 (12) TMI 253

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... olled outlets are concerned, the previous decision for another assessment year, in the assessee’s case; reported as “Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns “N” Petals” (2017 (5) TMI 1224 - DELHI HIGH COURT) cover the same, no question of law arises. Additions made as non refundable security - as held by the CIT(A) and ITAT to be not taxable - Held that:- The MOU .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion and addition on account of suppression of income from the self controlled outlets are concerned, the previous decision for another assessment year, in the assessee s case; reported as Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Meeta Gutgutia Prop. M/s Ferns N Petals (2017) 395 ITR 526 cover the same, no question of law arises. The other questions relate to the additions made as non refundabl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X