Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (3) TMI 1305

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.[2008 (9) TMI 14 - SUPREME COURT] correctly held to be as capital receipt. We are of the opinion that the impugned order of the ITAT does not disclose any infirmity. No substantial question of law arises. - ITA 193/2015 - - - Dated:- 13-3-2015 - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA For the Appellant: Sh. Rohit Madan and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... inion that the amount had to be treated as revenue receipt. The assessee s appeal likewise was unsuccessful. The CIT(A), after considering the nature of the scheme and various decisions, including the one rendered by the Supreme Court in Sahney Steel and Press Works Ltd. v. CIT 1997 (228) ITR 253, confirmed the order of the AO. The ITAT reversed these concurrent findings after taking note of th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... uently remitted the matter to the High Court which in turn confirmed its previous opinion and required consideration of the matter by the State Government, the Revenue urges that in the present case, the sales tax subsidy independently too cannot be treated as capital receipt but should be brought to tax as proposed by the AO. Learned counsel heavily relied upon Sahney Steel (supra), particularly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the occasion to deal with the issues in CIT v. Bougainvillea Multiplex Entertainment Centre Pvt. Ltd. (ITA 586/2013, decided on 30.01.2015) where the decision in Ponni Sugars (supra) and previous authorities were discussed and applied in given facts of the case. We are of the opinion that the impugned order of the ITAT does not disclose any infirmity. No substantial question of law arises. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates