TMI Blog2008 (5) TMI 702X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... was dismissed on 22.3.2001 is restored to its original number. The Appeal concerns a challenge to preventive detention at the pre execution. stage. The facts and events go back to 1991. According to the Respondents, the Order could not be executed because the Appellant had adopted methods whereby service could not be effected. According to the Appellant he had not adopted any methods to defeat ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s shall be served on the Appellant on that date. In this manner the order which could not be served on the Appellant for last over 15 years shall stand served on the Appellant. For a period of 10 days thereafter the Respondents are directed to refrain from taking any coercive steps against the Appellant. Whatever remedies are available to the Appellant, he may take recourse of. Appeal as well as C ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
