TMI Blog2010 (6) TMI 867X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... AT:- Following the decision in case of the Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. RPS Ors.[ 2007 (7) TMI 713 - SUPREME COURT] held that Only if there is any shortfall, the requisite number of Scheduled Caste women shall have to be taken by deleting the corresponding number of candidates from the bottom of the list relating to Scheduled Castes. To this extent, horizontal (special) reservation differs from vertical (social) reservation. Thus women selected on merit within the vertical reservation quota will be counted against the horizontal reservation for women. In view of this, it is evident that the judgment and order of the High Court is not in consonance with law laid down by this Court in Rajesh Kumar Daria. The judgment and order impugned herein is liable to be set aside and all consequential orders become unenforceable and inconsequential. Thus, appeals succeed and are allowed. Judgment and order of the High Court passed in Writ Petition is hereby set aside. No costs. - Dr. B.S. Chauhan And Swatanter Kumar, JJ. JUDGMENT Dr. B. S. CHAUHAN,. 1. These appeals have been preferred by the Public Service Commission and the State Government of Uttaranchal being aggrieved of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed the first submission of respondent No.1 after examining the record of selection and came to the conclusion that last selected woman candidate who was given benefit of horizontal reservation for Uttaranchal women had secured marks higher than the last selected candidate in general category. Thus, the said candidate ought to have been appointed against the general category vacancy and respondent No.1 ought to have been offered the appointment giving her the benefit of horizontal reservation for Uttaranchal women. Hence, these appeals. 3. Shri S.S. Shamshery, Advocate appearing for the Commission and Shri Ashok Mahajan, Advocate appearing for the High Court have submitted that all the vacancies advertised had already been filled up before the writ petition could be filed. Not a single successful candidate had been impleaded as a respondent before the High Court. Thus, the petition ought to have been dismissed for not impleading the necessary parties. The High Court did not consider the issue of acceptance of domicile certificates by the Uttaranchal women at a belated stage nor any finding has been recorded on the said issue. The High Court failed to consider the principle that i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ). However, in the instant case, the advertisement itself made it clear that the vacancies could be increased and decreased and before completion of the selection process, a decision had been taken to fill up 42 instead of 35 vacancies and reservation policy had been implemented accordingly. 7. In case the respondent No.1 wanted her selection against the reserved category vacancy, the last selected candidate in that category was a necessary party and without impleading her, the writ petition could not have been entertained by the High Court in view of the law laid down by nearly a Constitution Bench of this Court in Udit Narain Singh Malpaharia Vs. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar Anr., AIR 1963 SC 786, wherein the Court has explained the distinction between necessary party, proper party and proforma party and further held that if a person who is likely to suffer from the order of the Court and has not been impleaded as a party has a right to ignore the said order as it has been passed in violation of the principles of natural justice. More so, proviso to Order I, Rule IX of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter called CPC) provide that nonjoinder of necessar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ord to show that the said application had ever been allowed. Attempt had been made to implead some successful candidates before this Court but those applications stood rejected by this Court. 13. The view taken by the High Court on application of horizontal reservation is contrary to the law laid down by this Court in Rajesh Kumar Daria Vs. Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ors. AIR 2007 SC 3127, wherein dealing with a similar issue this Court held as under: 9. The second relates to the difference between the nature of vertical reservation and horizontal reservation. Social reservations in favour of SC, ST and OBC under Article 16(4) are vertical reservations . Special reservations in favour of physically handicapped, women, etc., under Articles 16(1) or 15(3) are horizontal reservations . Where a vertical reservation is made in favour of a Backward Class under Article 16(4), the candidates belonging to such Backward Class, may compete for nonreserved posts and if they are appointed to the nonreserved posts on their own merit, their number will not be counted against the quota reserved for respective Backward Class. Therefore, if the number of SC candidates, who by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
