TMI Blog1913 (5) TMI 1X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e plaintiff's favour, but certain persons have preferred an appeal. They are the purchasers of a portion of the property which the court below has ordered to be sold. The present suit was instituted on the 11th of July, 1910, but the appellants were not made parties to that suit until the 14th of July, 1911. It will thus appear that the suit was barred against them unless something had happene ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dgment within the meaning of Section 19 of the Limitation Act. If it could be made good that the statement might apply equally to one of two mortgages and did not apply to both, a great deal might be said for the present appeal. However, the statement of Ram Dayal must be taken in conjunction with the circumstances and the rest of the statement he made. It appears that on the 30th of October, 1888 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as a whole, it is perfectly clear that he was referring to the two mortgages of the 24th of January, 1892, though he was probably unaware that the money was advanced on two documents instead of one. 2. It is quite clear that he was referring to the entire debt due to Janki Prasad because he refers to some members of each of the two sets of mortgagors though he does not name them all correctly. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
