9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 1634X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... comes up on an application (55695/2017) with a prayer that this petition be disposed of in terms of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Jaipur vs. M/s. Bharti Hexacom Limited. D.B. Income Tax Appeal No.200/2016 decided on 11.07.2017. The petitioner-applicant-Company has laid this petition, aggrieved of the impugned order dated 30.05.20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... me Tax Appeal No.1/2014 titled M/s. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited (VSML) vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward TDS-2, Jaipur. Counsel submitted that the petition be accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Jaipur vs. M/s. Bharti Hexacom Limited. (supra). Mr. Nikhil Simlote appearing for the respondent-Income Tax Officer submitted that the petitioner-Company sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ore the ITAT. Further in view of the petitioner's case that the issue before the ITAT is fully covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), Jaipur vs. M/s. Bharti Hexacom Limited. (supra) it would also be free to move afresh an application for extension of stay order before the ITAT. Appropriate order thereon be passed. This petition as also the applicati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
