TMI Blog1930 (3) TMI 15X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o defend it. 2. The relevant facts, as stated by Counsel for both parties before me are, that on 7th January 1926, the firm Ghulam Farid-Fazal Karim instituted a suit for recovery of ₹ 5,000 on foot of a hundi against firm Karim Baksh-Fateh Muhammad, through Karim Bakhsh and his son Fateh Muhammad, in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Lahore. Along with the plaint a petition ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d of the house in question in favour of Dar-bari Ram and Amar Ditta, petitioners. The mortgage was stated to have been with possession and it is claimed on behalf of the petitioners that they have been in possession ever since. 4. On 24th October 1928, the decree-holders, having obtained a transfer certificate, proceeded to execute the decree by attachment of the house through the Senior Subord ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed relates to private alienations of property after it had been attached by order of a Court. In this case no order of attachment had been passed. All that the trial Judge had done was to issue, an ad interim injunction restraining the defendant from alienating the house. It is conceded by Mr. Faqir Chand that Section 64 has no application to a case in which an alienation has been made after the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
