TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1226X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Advocate For The Respondent : DR ORDER Per: Justice (Dr.) Satish Chandra: The present appeal is filed against Order-in-Appeal No. 55-16-17 dated 25.10.2016. Period of dispute is June, 2012 to August, 2014. 2. The brief facts of the case are that during the period under consideration, the appellant was having its factory at Ghatal in Bhiwadi where advance license was procured on 14.10.2010 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l for the parties. 4. After hearing both the parties and on perusal of material available on record, it appears that Directorate General of Foreign Trade has originally, issued license in the name of Ghatal unit. The fire is not in dispute. The appellant at Kahrani unit received the goods from M/s. Reliance which were used in the manufacture of export goods. Originally, license was issued to pres ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|