2018 (4) TMI 1296

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .Silambanan for M/s.Silambanan Associates For Respondent : Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai ORDER Heard Mr.S.Silambanan, learned senior counsel appearing for M/s.Silambannan Associates, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Kanmani Annamalai, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2.The petitioner who is a registered dealer on the file of the second respondent has file .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .2005, 10.05.2005, 31.01.2006 and 21.02.2006. But the petitioner did not appeared before the second respondent and did not co-operate in the assessment proceedings. In fact the conduct of the petitioner has been noted by the respondent and his non-cooperation has also been recorded in the impugned assessment order. However, in the impugned assessment order the respondent would admit that the petit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ars. 4.Thus, this Court is of the view that to enable the petitioner to contest the matter on merits, no prejudice would be caused to the revenue if the copies of D7 records recovered from the petitioner's business premises are furnished at the cost of the petitioner. 5.Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of with the following directions: The second respondent is directed to furnis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X