TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1514X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ular is applicable. A construction that the said Circular is not applicable to assessment orders passed prior to 01.3.2016, cannot be said to be totally unsustainable The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. [1973 (1) TMI 1 - SUPREME Court] has expounded that if two constructions are possible, one in favour of the assessee should be applied. On the facts of the present case, and on the touch stone of the above said Hon’ble Apex Court decision, it is of considered opinion that the assessee’s plea that the appeal filed manually for assessment order passed prior to 01.03.2016, should be admitted by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), is cogent. More so, when the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Income Tax (Appeals) noted that In absence of any information from the AO to this effect, the appeal filed by the assessee is treated being well within time. 4. Thereafter, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) considered the admissibility of appeal filed in manual form on 30.6.2016. In this regard, he referred to be CBDT Notification No. SO 637(E) [No. 11/2016 dated 01.03.2016] and has referred as under: In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 249, read with section 295 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (43 of 1961), the Central Board of Direct Taxes hereby makes the following rules further to amend the Income-tax Rules, 1962, namely 1. (1) These rules may be called the Income-tax (3rd Amend ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ome-tax (Systems), as the case may be, shall- ( i) specify the procedure for electronic filing of Form No. 35 and documents; ( ii) specify the data structure, standards and manner of generation of electronic verification code, referred to in sub-rule(2), for the purpose of verification of the person furnishing the said form; and ( iii) be responsible for formulating and implementing appropriate security, archival and retrieval of policies in relation to the said form so furnished. 5. Thereafter, he referred to the amendment to Rule 2(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1962 where the mode of filing of the return income in electronically form is specified. Thereafter, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) referred to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... iod would be treated as appeals filed in time. 3. In view of the extended window for filing e-appeals, taxpayers who could not successfully e-file their appeal and had filed paper appeals and required to file an e-appeal in accordance with Rule 45 before the extended period i.e. 15.06.2016. Such e-appeals would also be treated as appeals filed within time. 6. From the above, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) noted that the assessee was required to file this appeal only in electronic form latest by 15.06.2016. However, since the appeal was filed manually as a paper appeal, the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) held that since the same was not electronically filed, he treated the appeal is not maintainable. 7. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er 01.03.2016, cannot be brushed aside summarily. When this question was put to the ld. Departmental Representative, she replied that since the assessment order has been served to the assessee after 01.03.2016, the assessee s ground taken cannot be sustained. 11. Upon careful consideration, I find that in the above CBDT Circular, admittedly there is no discussion about the date of assessment order, with respect to which the said Circular is applicable. A construction that the said Circular is not applicable to assessment orders passed prior to 01.3.2016, cannot be said to be totally unsustainable. The Hon ble Apex Court in the case of CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd. [1973] 88 ITR 192 (SC) has expounded that if two constructions are poss ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
