2018 (5) TMI 446

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvale i/by. PDS Legal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w. Mr. Samiksha Kanani, Advocate for the respondent.   P.C. : 1. These two petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges two orders dated 7th February, 2018 passed under Section 201(1)/201(1)(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) alongwith two consequent demand notices in .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... consequent to the orders within a period of seven days. This without giving any reasons for curtailing the statutorily available period of 30 days in terms of Section 220 of the Act. 3. Mr. Suresh Kumar, Learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue objects to the petition being entertained as the impugned orders dated 7th February, 2018 are appeallable to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) und .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... off within a period of 4 months from the date of filing of the Appeals by the petitioners. 5. Mr. Mistri, Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners, states that, the petitioner would file the two Appeals to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) from the two orders dated 7th February, 2018 within a period of 2 weeks from today. 6. The impugned orders dated 7th February, 2018 had bee .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X