TMI Blog2018 (3) TMI 1593X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - Stay petition - proceedings calling upon the petitioners to pay 20% of the disputed demand within three days so that recovery of balance demand can be stayed - Held that:- The fact that the petitioners have already approached the 2nd respondent by way of their applications dated 02.02.2018 questioning the very order passed by the first respondent, which is impugned herein, this Court is of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... impugned communication thus indicated further that failure to make such payment would result in treating the stay petition as rejected and for proceeding to recover the demand as arrived in the order of assessment. 2. W.P.Nos.4778 to 4783 of 2018 are filed by the Company, whereas W.P.Nos.4784 to 4790 of 2018 are filed by one of its Directors. The impugned order in each writ petition was passed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Assessing Authority, while considering the Stay Petition called upon the petitioners to pay 20% of the disputed demand as a condition precedent for staying the demand. Now, the said order of the Assessing Authority is challenged before this Court. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners, though sought to raise very many grounds on merits of the demand, this Court is not inclined to go into the s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ecovery proceedings. 6. Learned senior standing counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the applications filed before the 2nd respondent will be considered and orders will be passed on merits and in accordance with law within a short time. 7. Considering the above stated facts and circumstances, more particularly, the fact that the petitioners have already approached the 2nd res ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|