9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (5) TMI 1626X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... MEMBER: This is assessee's appeal for Assessment Year 2013-14, contending that the ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the imposition of late filing fee, under section 234E, of an amount of Rs. 25,000/-, without considering the fact that the TDS statement was filed and tax was deposited in time and there was no provision under section 200A for levy of late fee u/s 234E for the period from 1.1.20 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... om 137 (Guj), wherein, it has been held that section 200A of the Act is a machinery provision providing the mechanism for processing a statement of deduction of tax at source and for making adjustments. The ld. CIT(A) has held that this decision was delivered after considering numerous ITAT/High Court decisions and so, this decision in 'Rajesh Kaurani' (supra) holds the field. 4. We do not find t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... not a case where the decision against the assessee has been rendered by the Jurisdictional High Court qua the assessee. 5. In 'Shri Fatehraj Singhvi and Others' (supra) it has been held, inter alia, as follows: "22. It is hardly required to be stated that, as per the well established principles of interpretation of statute, unless it is expressly provided or impliedly demonstrated, any provisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... In view of the above, respectfully following 'Shri Fatehraj Singhvi and Others' (supra), 'Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT (TDS)', order dated 09.06.2015 passed in ITA No.90/ASR/2015, for A.Y.2013-14, by the Amritsar Bench of the Tribunal, and 'Shri Kaur Chand Jain vs. DCIT, CPC (TDS) Ghaziabad', order dated 15.09.2016, in ITA No.378/ASR/2015, for A.Y. 2012-13, the grievance of the assessee is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
