TMI Blog2018 (6) TMI 798X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ebited towards such service in the Cenvat Credit Account has not been considered by the Original Authority while adjudicating the dispute - Held that:- The matter remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for proper factual finding where the amount in question has been debited by the appellant from its CENVAT credit account. If the amount has already been debited, as given by the appellant, the demand should be on such account, which should be dropped by the Original Authority. Supply of Manpower Services - appellant contended that they have deposited service tax amount towards such category of service - Held that:- Since there is no specific finding with regard to payment made by the appellant, at this juncture, this matter should ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... icating Authority has confirmed service tax demand under different categories of services. As such, for convenience of reference, we are discussing the different services:- 3. Supply of tangible goods The appellant submits that the bunk house accommodation is created at the site of the client and therefore, such activity cannot be taxed under the category of supply of tangible goods . To support such stand, the appellant has relied on the decision of this Tribunal in the case of Hotel Kailash International 2018 TIOL-434-CESTAT-DEL. For ascertaining the nature of activities provided by the appellant to its client, we have perused the agreement placed in the case records. If bunk house is created at plot at site with vari ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tax demand on supply of camp cannot be taxed under supply of tangible goods service . However, we are of the view that facts as contended by the appellant can only be verified by the adjudicating authority. We ask the Original Adjudicating Authority to verify the facts once again and decide the matter afresh. 4. Renting of immovable property: The appellant submits that the amount debited towards such service in the Cenvat Credit Account has not been considered by the Original Authority while adjudicating the dispute. Therefore, we remand the matter to the Original Adjudicating Authority for proper factual finding where the amount in question has been debited by the appellant from its cenvat credit account. If the amount has alread ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hus, the demand in this count is liable to be set aside. Accordingly, it is ordered so. 7. The appellant also contended that excess service tax paid in respect of taxable service viz. security service, GTA and rent-a-cab service amounting to ₹ 1,42,723/- has not been considered during the course of investigation. Further, the appellant also contended that the amount of ₹ 15,00,000/- deposited under protest, during the course of investigation, though was appropriated in the adjudication order but the said amount was also confirmed as service tax demand additionally, resulting in double confirmation of the said amount. Since we are remanding the matter to the Original Authority, for consideration of other issues, we are of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
