2014 (9) TMI 1155

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... impugned order was duly received by him on 10.6.2003. Thus the appellants have clearly mis-represented the facts in their condonation of delay application claiming that they received the impugned order only on 25.2.2013 - delay cannot be condoned - COD Application dismissed. - E/COD/59963/2013, E/Stay/59962/2013 and E/59325/2013-EX(DB) - F. Order No. 53734/2014 - Dated:- 2-9-2014 - Hon ble Mr. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... appellants claim and given documentary evidence of receipt of the impugned order in appeal on 10.6.2003. The receipt shows that the order was received on that date by Shri Dinesh Kumar Agarwal, Director. As regards, the contention that they got certified copy of the order on the direction of the Honble High Court, it is seen that the Honble High Court vide its order dated 13th October 2008 not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X