TMI Blog2017 (3) TMI 1679X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Vs. Ram Pistons & Rings Ltd. (2008 (5) TMI 631 - DELHI HIGH COURT), the view taken by the Tribunal is just and proper and this issue is also required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. Section 80JJAA claim permanency is not there and increase is there. The Tribunal while considering the same has taken into consideration the provisions of that Section and rightly granted the benefit in favour of the assessee. Therefore that issue is also required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. Regarding Section 43B of the Act, establishment and research is always for the purpose of benefit of the business. In that view of the matter, the said issue is also required to be answered in favour of the assessee and against the department. - D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 327/2005, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 615/2008, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 638/2008, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 300/2009, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 303/2009, D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 640/2009 - - - Dated:- 21-3-2017 - Mr. Mahendra Maheshwari J. For the Appellant(s) : Mr. R.B. Mathur with Mr. K.D. Mathur For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjay Jhanwar ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r of the company has increased from ₹ 92.33 Crore in F.Y. 2003-04 to ₹ 152.00 Crore F.Y.2004-05, relevant to the A.Y. 5087 crore to ₹ 11.02 crore during this period (before depreciation). The net profit has been declared as ₹ 8.98 crore as against ₹ 5.57 crore in the preceding year. 6. The main question common in all appeals is regarding commission and brokerage which is paid under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act. Counsel for the department has taken us to the provisions of Section 37 which reads as under:- 37. (1) Any expenditure (not being expenditure of the nature described in sections 30 to 36 and not being in the nature of capital expenditure or personal expenses of the assessee), laid out or expended wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the business or profession shall be allowed in computing the income chargeable under the head Profits and gains of business or profession . [ Explanation 1. ]-For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that any expenditure incurred by an assessee for any purpose which is an offence or which is prohibited by law shall not be deemed to have been incurred for the purpose of business or profe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... so called commission agents is not based on any evidence. 51. We are, therefore, of the opinion that in the ultimate analysis, the assessee is able to show that it has paid brokerage b commission to the commission agents for the purpose of the business of the assessee and is entitled to deduction. Thus considering the entirety of the facts and the alternative ground No. 5 of the assessee and the possible leakage disallowance of ₹ 25.00 lacs is sustained out of total disallowance of ₹ 4,56,22,058/- and the balance disallowance of ₹ 4,31,22,058/- is directed to be deleted. 9. Counsel has contended that in view of the explanation to Section 37 of the Act and more particularly the finding of the Assessing Officer at page 7 which are quoted below, the view taken by the Tribunal is required to be reversed:- However in the quarterly results of the company huge commission payment were shown to reduce the profits. Statement of Sh. Anant Luharia, who is Manager (Finance) and supervises the works relating to accounts and financial management, was recorded on 13-03-2003. He told in reply to Q.No. 12 that he can t say for sure that books of accounts, which were ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... unt was just left in the hands of the father in law of the assessee. The Tribunal disbelieved the story, which is prima-facie a fantastic story. It is story that does not accord with human probabilities. Science has not yet invented any instrument to test the reliability of the evidence placed before a Court or Tribunal. Therefore, the Courts and Tribunals have to judge the evidence before them by applying the test of human probabilities. Human minds may differ as to the reliability of a piece or evidence. 9. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in yet another case, of Sumati Dayal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Supra) has observed as under:- In our opinion the majority opinion after considering the surrounding circumstances and applying the test of human probabilities has rightly concluded that the claim about the amount being winnings from races is not genuine. It cannot be said that explanation offered by the assessee in respect of the said amount has been rejected unreasonably and that finding that the said amounts are income of the assessee from other sources is not based on evidence. 11. And in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Premier Brewer ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... if not prohibited, liaisoning with the government corporations by the manufacturers for the purpose of obtaining supply orders. The true effect of the Government Circulars along with the agreements between the assessee and the commission agents and the details of payments made by the assessee to the commission agents as well as the affidavits filed by the husbands of the partners of M/s. R.J. Associates were considered by the High Court. The statement of the Managing Director of Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd. (TASMAC Ltd.), to whom summons were issued under Section 131 of the Act, to the effect that M/s. Golden Enterprises had not done any liaisoning work with TASMAC Ltd. was also taken into account. The basis of the doubts regarding the very existence of R.J. Associates, as entertained by the Assessing Officer, was also weighed by the High Court to determine the entitlement of the assessee for deduction under Section 37 of the Act. In performing the said exercise the High Court did not disturb or reverse the primary facts as found by the learned Tribunal. Rather, the exercise performed is one of the correct legal inferences that should be drawn on the facts already re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... year in which such sum is actually paid by him : Provided that nothing contained in this section shall apply in relation to any sum which is actually paid by the assessee on or before the due date applicable in his case for furnishing the return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 in respect of the previous year in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred as aforesaid and the evidence of such payment is furnished by the assessee along with such return. Explanation 1.-For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that where a deduction in respect of any sum referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) of this section is allowed in computing the income referred to in section 28 of the previous year (being a previous year relevant to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of April, 1983, or any earlier assessment year) in which the liability to pay such sum was incurred by the assessee, the assessee shall not be entitled to any deduction under this section in respect of such sum in computing the income of the previous year in which the sum is actually paid by him. Explanation 2.-For the purposes of clause (a), as in force at all materi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o have been actually paid. Explanation 3D.-For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that a deduction of any sum, being interest payable under clause (e) of this section, shall be allowed if such interest has been actually paid and any interest referred to in that clause which has been converted into a loan or advance shall not be deemed to have been actually paid. Explanation 4.-For the purposes of this section,- (a) public financial institutions shall have the meaning assigned to it in section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956); (aa) scheduled bank shall have the meaning assigned to it in the Explanation to clause (iii) of subsection (5) of section 11 ; (b) State financial corporation means a financial corporation established under section 3 or section 3A or an institution notified under section 46 of the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 (63 of 1951); (c) State industrial investment corporation means a Government company within the meaning of section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), engaged in the business of providing long-term finance for industrial projects and eligible for deduction under clause (viii) of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e aforesaid incentives to prestigious units announced by Government of Gujarat on 26/07/91 makes it amply clear that the scheme was announced to attract investment in core sector industry having potential, to spur industrial growth in ancillary, tertiary and secondary sector of the economy. The other scheme announced by the Government of Gujarat as Capital Investment Incentive Scheme on 11th September 1995 was intended to attract investments to generate greater employment in less industrially developed areas of Gujarat and also to secure balanced development of industries in Gujarat through dispersal of industries in the most backward area and backward areas. It is thus clear that the object of both the scheme was to ensure development of backward areas or for development of core sector industries in the State or for generating the employment. Perusal of both the schemes shows that the incentives extended to the eligible units were, inter alia, through exemption from payment of Sales Tax. Thus, the object of both the schemes was to attract capital investment to ensure development of backward areas and the modality or mechanism chosen to attract such investment was, inter alia, th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Steel and Press Works Ltd . and others v. Commissioner of Income -tax reported in 228 ITR 253, the Apex Court held and observed that the character of the subsidy in the hands of the recipient whether revenue or capital will have to be determined, having regard to the purpose for which the subsidy is given. The source of fund is quite immaterial. If the purpose is to help the assessee to set up its business or complete a project the monies must be treated as having been received for capital purposes. But, if monies are given to the assessee for assisting him in carrying out the business operations and given after the satisfaction of the conditions of commencement of production, such subsidy must be treated as assistance for the purpose of the trade. 14. In the result, we do not find that the Tribunal has committed any error. No question of law, therefore, arises. Tax Appeals are therefore dismissed. 10. In the case of Deputy Commissioner of Income -tax v. Munjal Auto Industries Ltd . (supra), this Court has observed as under:-- 7. From the provisions of the said scheme, it clearly emerges that the subsidy though computed in terms of sales tax deferment or w ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed 25.2.2001 refers to a paper book filed by the respondent-assessee in support of his contention that the agents were interacting with the State Road/Municipal Transport Corporation/ Undertakings. It was observed that there was no evidence or material, except suspicion or a surmise that the commission payment, in fact, represents illegal gratification paid to unknown officers and therefore, should not be allowed as a deduction. A factual decision is perverse if the authority has acted without any evidence or on a view of facts cannot be reasonably entertained. A perverse finding is one, if it is arrived at without any material or if it is arrived at or inference is made on material which would not have been accepted or relied upon by any reasonable person. It is based on surmise, conjectures or suspicions and is not rationally possible. A factual conclusion is regarded as perverse, when no person duly instructed or acting judicially could upon the record before him, have reached the conclusion arrived at the tribunal/authority. [See CIT Vs. S.P. Jain (1973) 87 ITR 370 (SC)]. On the basis of material referred to and the reasoning given by the tribunal it is no possible to hold that ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
