TMI Blog2018 (7) TMI 866X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... adjudicating authority was required to follow the ratio in Jindal Industries v. Union of India [2002 (5) TMI 63 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI] - Held that:- It is seen that the directions are amply clear and the Tribunal has instructed that the ratio in re Jindal Industries, cited by Learned Authorized Representative, should be followed. We do not consider this to be an erroneous recording of submission b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... - Shri Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) And Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) Shri D.H. Nadkarni, Advocate for the appellant Shri Chatru Singh, Assistant Commissioner (AR) for the respondent ORDER Per: C J Mathew M/s Dujodwalla Products Ltd has filed this application for rectification of mistake in final order no. A/89926/17/CB dated 18 th September 2017. While disposi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he directions are amply clear and the Tribunal has instructed that the ratio in re Jindal Industries, cited by Learned Authorized Representative, should be followed. We do not consider this to be an erroneous recording of submission but find this to be a deliberated direction to the adjudicating authority. The Tribunal may have erred in its judgement but it does not appear to have erred in the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
