Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2018 (7) TMI 993

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... upplementary invoices / billing done by the respondents, since the second mode of billing was not declared in the ER-1 Returns. This aspect has not been disputed by the respondents either before the lower authorities or even in the cross objections filed by them - the respondents cannot make a claim that the entire manner of billing both by Central Excise invoices and also by supplementary invoice .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... receiving duty paid chassis from Ashok Leyland Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ALL). They took credit of duty paid on the said chassis, built cabin at Gummidipoondi unit and finally built dipper body with hydraulic system at their Ambattur unit. The respondents were clearing fully built chassis with the dipper body on payment of duty. However, they were also raising commercial / supplementary inv .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f appellant-Revenue, Ld.A.R Shri S. Govindarajan reiterates the grounds of appeal. He further disputes the conclusions of Commissioner (Appeals) on ER1 return by pointing out that in the ER1 returns filed by respondents details about the additional billing / supplementary invoices were not declared. 4. On the other hand, on behalf of the respondents, Ld. Counsel Shri M.Kannan supports the impug .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng was not declared in the ER-1 Returns. This aspect has not been disputed by the respondents either before the lower authorities or even in the cross objections filed by them. We are afraid that the respondents cannot make a claim that the entire manner of billing both by Central Excise invoices and also by supplementary invoices for job work was known to the department. This being so, the findin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of the department are therefore allowed. The cross objections of the respondents, which are more in the nature of written submissions and which also for some reason makes a prayer to set aside not the impugned order but the Order-in-Original dt. 05.08.2009 of the original authority, are also disposed of accordingly. ( Dictated and pronounced in court ) - - TaxTMI - TMITax - Central Excise .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates