TMI Blog2018 (7) TMI 1557X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... income it had earned was entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a) - ITA No.537/Coch/2017, ITA No.538/Coch/2017, ITA No.539/Coch/2017, ITA No.540/Coch/2017, ITA No.541/Coch/2017, CO No.04/Coch/2018, CO No.05/Coch/2018, CO No.06/Coch/2018, CO No.07/Coch/2018 And CO No.08/Coch/2018, ITA No.506/Coch/2017 - - - Dated:- 23-7-2018 - Shri Chandra Poojari, AM And Shri George George K, JM ITA No.507/Coch/2017, ITA No.508/Coch/2017, ITA No.509/Coch/2017 And ITA No.510/Coch/2017 For The Revenue : Sri. A. Dhanaraj, Sr. DR For The Assessee : Sri. H. S. Bhatt ORDER Per Bench These cross appeals and cross objections at the instance of the assessee, are directed against the consolidated order of the CIT(A) dated13. 06. 2017. The relevant assessment years are 2007-2008, 2007-2008, 2009-2010, 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. Since common issues are raised in these cross appeals and cross objections, they were heard together and are being disposed off by this consolidated order. 2. First we shall take up for adjudication the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Cross Objections filed by the assessee, which are supporting the order of the CIT(A). 3. The brief facts of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tax, Circle- 9(1), Hyderabad taken into consideration the activities of the assessee society and not relied only on the certificate of registration issued by the Central Registrar of Cooperative societies . In view of this, is not the decision of the CIT(A) against the prevailing positions of law that differentiates between de jure and de facto positions and which permits the principle of penetration of the corporate veil to determine the true nature of the activities of the cooperative society? 3 . Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is right in law in holding that the assessee is eligible for claiming deduction u/s 80P on the above lines, when in the recent decision in the case of The Citizen Co-Operative Society, the Honourable Supreme Court has, after taking into account the activities of the appellant Co-operative Society, held that the appellant could not be treated as a cooperative society meant only for its members and providing credit facilities only to its members . 4 . The Honourable Supreme Court: had in the case of The Citizen Co-Operative Society limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... edits on the basis of mere registration and classification . In view of this, is not the decision of the CIT(A) without merits? 8 . For these and other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing, it is requested that the order of the CIT(A) may be set aside and that of the Assessing Officer restored . 9 . Even though the tax effect is below the prescribed limit, appeal is being filed as the tax effect exceeds the prescribed limit for filing further appeal in the other assessment year in the combined order . 6. The learned Departmental Representative relied on the grounds raised. The learned AR, on the other hand, submitted that the issue in question is covered in favour of the assessee by the judgment of the Hon ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of The Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd . and Others (supra) . 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. We find that an identical issue was considered in the case of ITO v . The Chengala Service Cooperative Bank Limited [ITA No . 434/Coch/2017 Ors . order dated 05th April, 2018] . In that case, identical grounds have been raised ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r such State law . This, we visualize as due reciprocative legislative exercise by the Parliament recognizing the predominance of decisions rendered under the relevant State Law . In this view of the matter, all the appellants having been classified as primary agricultural credit societies by the competent authority under the KCS Act it has necessarily to be held that the principal object of such societies is to undertake agricultural credit activities and to provide loans and advances for agricultural purposes; the rate of interest on such loans and advances to be at the rate fixed by the Registrar of co-operative societies under the KCS Act and having its area of operation confined to a village, panchayat or a municipality . This is the consequence of the definition clause in section 2(oaa) of the KCS Act . The authorities under the IT Act cannot probe into any issue or such matter relating to such applicants . 16 . The position of law being as above with reference to the statutory provisions, the appellants had shown to the authorities and the Tribunal that they are primary agricultural credit societies in terms of clause (cciv) of section 5 of the BR Act h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he business of banking and therefore, would not be entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Income-tax Act . In the context of the submission made by the Revenue, let us examine whether the judgment of the Hon ble Apex Court in the case of Citizens Co-operative Society Ltd . ( supra) has application to the facts of the present cases . 8 . The Hon ble Apex Court judgment in the case of Citizen Co-operative Society (supra) Ltd . was rendered in the context of eligibility of a Credit Cooperative Society for deduction under section 80 P of the Act . The Apex Court, referring to the specific facts of the case held that the assessee therein is not entitled for deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act . In the aforesaid case, the Hon'ble Apex Court was not dealing with a case of eligibility of a Primary Agricultural Credit Society for deduction under section 80P of the Income-tax Act . The Hon ble Supreme Court at Para 23 of the aforesaid judgment had emphasized that even after the amendment made to the provisions of section 80P of the Act by insertion of section 80P(4) of the Income-tax Act, the Primary Agricultural Credit Society is eligible for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... s mostly from a carved out category of member viz nominal member who are not members as per the provisions of law referred, and that most of the business of the assessee therein was with this carved out category of person and also granting loans to public and without the approval from the Registrar of the Societies . 8 . 3 As far as the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act which is applicable to the present case is concerned, the definition of a 'member' as provided in Section 2(1) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act includes a nominal member . Section 2 (1) of the said Act is as follows: Member means a person joining in the application for the registration of a co-operative society or a person admitted to membership after such registration in accordance with this Act, the Rules and the Bye law and includes a nominal or associate member 8 . 4 The normal member is defined under 2(M) of the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969, which reads as follow:- ( m) nominal or associate member means a member who possesses only such privileges and rights of a member and who is subject only to such liabilities of a member as may be spec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ion 2(19) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 takes within its sweep even a nominal member, associate member and sympathizer member . There is no distinction made between duly registered member and nominal, associate and sympathizer member . 19 . In the case of K . K . Adhikari (cited supra), Division Bench of this Court has held that the definition of a Member under Section 2(19) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 includes a nominal member or a sympathizer member . It is further held that notwithstanding the fact that a nominal member does not enjoy all the rights and privileges which are available to an ordinary member, his status is that of a member as defined in Section 2(19) of the Act . 20 . Division Bench of this Court in the case of The Commissioner of Income Tax, Nasik (cited supra) has also taken a similar view that the definition of Member under section 2(19)(a) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 includes a nominal member . It is further held by the Division Bench that there is nothing in Section 80P(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act to the contrary . 8 . 8 As per section 3 of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Tribunal, we hold that the CIT(A) was justified in directing the A. O. to grant deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I. T. Act. It is ordered accordingly. CO No . 04/Coch/2018 to 08/Coch/2018 9. The Cross Objections at the instance of the assessee are only supporting the order of the CIT(A) as regards the grant of deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I. T. Act. Since we have already dismissed the Revenue s appeals, the Cross Objections filed by the assessee have become infructuous and the same are dismissed as infructuous. Cross Appeals (ITA Nos . 506/C/2017 to 510/C/2017) 10. In ITA Nos. 506/Coch/2017 to 508/Coch/2017 concerning assessment years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, the assessee has raised two issues before the Tribunal, viz. , (i) Interest on treasury deposit whether it was entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I. T. Act; and (ii) Whether trade income was entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2) of the I. T. Act. As regards to the issue whether the assessee was entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the I. T. Act for the interest received on investment made with sub-treasuries, the same is covered in favour of the assessee by the v ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
