1999 (2) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed 15th October 1997 the Magistrate came to the conclusion that the appellant had failed to establish that the cheque in respect of which the proceedings were instituted was in respect of a debt legally enforceable. On this ground and also on account of the doubt raised as to whether the cheque in question was written by the respondent, though the signatures were not denied, the Magistrate gave be .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd, learned Advocate Shri C.A. Ferreira, appearing for the respondent, submitted before me that the dishonoured cheque in question was not in respect of a legally enforceable debt and in view of Explanation to section 138 of the said Act, the Magistrate has rightly acquitted the respondent on the said count as well as on the ground that there was doubt as to whether the amount mentioned in the sai .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellant/complainant within 12 months and in case he fails to make the said payment during the said period, the said amount was to carry bank interest from the date of the agreement. The case of the complainant further is that the respondent did not pay the amount as agreed under the said Agreement dated 13th June, 1991, but on 19th July, 1996 the respondent issued cheque for ₹ 3,87,500 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ically taken by the respondent in the course of the trial and, as such, it was necessary for the complainant to have sought the opinion of handwriting expert in case her case was that the cheque in question was in the handwriting of the respondent, so as to rebut the theory of blank cheque taken by the respondent. It is in these circumstances that the Magistrate had come to the conclusion that the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... limitation because no acknowledgement was obtained before the expiry of 3 years from the date of loan. In these circumstances, it was held there that the debt was not legally enforceable at the time of issuance of cheque and the accused could not be punished under section 138 of the said Act. In the light of Explanation to the said section, it was further held therein that in case a cheque is iss .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X