TMI Blog2018 (9) TMI 1215X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... f the Act - main ground on which Ext.P5 order is attacked is that since the petitioner sought rectification in respect of Ext.P1 order, the same should have been considered by the second respondent, the original authority and not the first respondent - Held that:- In so far as the appeal preferred by the petitioner is dismissed for non payment of pre-deposit, there is no merger as pointed out by t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ater, the petitioner preferred Ext.P4 application for rectification of Ext.P1 order, invoking Section 74 of the Act. The application was rejected by the first respondent in terms of Ext.P5 order. Ext.P5 order is under challenge in this writ petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. 3. The main ground on which Ext.P5 or ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
