TMI Blog2015 (12) TMI 1775X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... legislation in accordance with the principle that where there are general words in a later statute it cannot be held that the earlier statutes are repealed altered or discarded - The Preamble of the RTI Act, 2005 itself recognizes the fact that since the revealing of certain information is likely to conflict with other public interests like “the preservation of confidentiality of sensitive information”, there is a need to harmonise these conflicting interests. It is submitted that certain exemptions were carved out in the RTI Act to harmonise these conflicting interests. In the instant case, the RBI does not place itself in a fiduciary relationship with the Financial institutions (though, in word it puts itself to be in that position) because, the reports of the inspections, statements of the bank, information related to the business obtained by the RBI are not under the pretext of confidence or trust. In this case neither the RBI nor the Banks act in the interest of each other. By attaching an additional “fiduciary” label to the statutory duty, the Regulatory authorities have intentionally or unintentionally created an in terrorem effect - RBI is a statutory body set up by the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nce, RTI Act is enacted to empower the common people, the test to determine limits of Section 8 of RTI Act is whether giving information to the general public would be detrimental to the economic interests of the country? To what extent the public should be allowed to get information? The Legislature’s intent was to make available to the general public such information which had been obtained by the public authorities from the private body. Had it been the case where only information related to public authorities was to be provided, the Legislature would not have included the word “private body”. As in this case, the RBI is liable to provide information regarding inspection report and other documents to the general public - Even if we were to consider that RBI and the Financial Institutions shared a “Fiduciary Relationship”, Section 2(f) would still make the information shared between them to be accessible by the public. The facts reveal that Banks are trying to cover up their underhand actions, they are even more liable to be subjected to public scrutiny. We have surmised that many Financial Institutions have resorted to such acts which are neither clean nor transparent. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Narasimhan,Adv. Mr. Bharat Sangal,Adv. For the Respondent : Dr. Lalit Bhasin, Adv., Ms. Nina Gupta, Adv. Mr. Mudit Sharma,Adv., Mr. Prashant Bhushan,Adv. Mr. H. S. Parihar,Adv., Ms. Jyoti Mendiratta,Adv., Mr. K.R. Anand, Adv. Mr. Vivek Gupta,Adv., Ms. Manisha T. Karia,Adv. Ms. Srishti Rani, Adv., Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. Amol B. Karande, Adv. JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J. The main issue that arises for our consideration in these transferred cases is as to whether all the information sought for under the Right to Information Act, 2005 can be denied by the Reserve Bank of India and other Banks to the public at large on the ground of economic interest, commercial confidence, fiduciary relationship with other Bank on the one hand and the public interest on the other. If the answer to above question is in negative, then upto what extent the information can be provided under the 2005 Act. 2. It has been contended by the RBI that it carries out inspections of banks and financial institutions on regular basis and the inspection reports prepared by it contain a wide range of information that is collected in a fiduciary capacity. The facts in brief of the Transfer Case N ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... query No.2, 3 first part of 4, relying on the decision of the Full Bench of CIC passed in the case of Ravin Ranchochodlal Patel and another vs. Reserve Bank of India. Thereafter, in the second appeal preferred by the aggrieved respondent, the Central Information Commission by the impugned order dated 01.11.2011, directed RBI to provide information as per records to the Respondent in relation to queries Nos.2 to 6 before 30.11.2011. Aggrieved by the decision of the Central Information Commission (CIC), petitioner RBI moved the Delhi High Court by way of a Writ Petition inter alia praying for quashing of the aforesaid order of the CIC. The High Court, while issuing notice, stayed the operation of the aforesaid order. 4. Similarly, in Transfer Case No. 92 of 2015, the Respondent sought following information from the CPIO of RBI under the Act of 2005, reply to which is tabulated hereunder: Sr. No. Information sought Reply 1. The Hon ble FM made a written statement on the Floor of the House which inter alia must have been made after verifying the records from RBI and the Bank must have the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... enclosed). We, therefore, are unable to accede to your request. 4. Exact nature of irregularities committed by ICICI Bank in Hong Kong In this regard, self explicit print out taken from the website of Securities and Futures Commission, Hong Kong is enclosed. 5. ICICI Bank s Moscow Branch involved in money laundering act. We do not have the information. 6. Imposition of fine on ICICI Bank under Section 13 of the PMLA for loss of documents in floods . We do not have any information to furnish in this regard. 7. Copy of the Warning or Advisory Note issued twice issued to the bank in the last two years and reasons recorded therein. Name and designation of the authority who conducted this check and his decision to issue an advisory note only instead of penalties to be imposed under the Act. As regards your request for copies/details of advisory letters to ICICI Bank, we may state that such information is exempt from disclosure under Section 8(1)(a)(d) and (e) of the RTI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tive Bank from January, 2010 till date. Different Departments in NABARD deal with various issues related to MSCB. The query is general in nature. Applicant may please be specific in query/information sought. 3. Provide confirmed/draft minutes of meetings of Governing Board/Board of Directors/Committee of Directors of NABARD from April, 2007 till date Furnishing of information is exempt under Sec. 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act. 4. Provide information on compliance of Section 4 of RTI Act, 2005 by NABARD Compliance available on the website of NABARD i.e. www.nabard.org 5. Information may be provided on a CD - 7. The First Appellate Authority concurred with the CPIO and held that inspection report cannot be supplied in terms of Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act. The Respondent filed Second Appeal before the Central Information Commission, which was allowed. The RBI filed writ petition before the High Court challenging the order of the CIC dated 14.11.2011 on identical issue and the High Court stayed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the Respondent in relation to query Nos. 2(b) and 2(c) before 10.12.2011. The Commission has also directed the Governor RBI to display this information on its website before 31.12.2011, in fulfillment of its obligations under Section 4(1) (b) (xvii) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 and to update it each year. 10. In Transfer Case No.95 of 2015, following information was sought and reply to it is tabulated hereunder: Sl. No. Information Sought Reply 1 Complete and detailed information including related documents/correspondence/file noting etc of RBI on imposing fines on some banks for violating rules like also referred in enclosed news clipping As the violations of which the banks were issued Show Cause Notices and subsequently imposed penalties and based on the findings of the Annual Financial Inspection (AFI) of the banks, and the information is received by us in a fiduciary capacity, the disclosure of such information would prejudicially affect the economic interests of the State and harm the bank s competitive position. The SCNs/findings/reports/ associated co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the Second Appeal, the CIC heard the respondent via telephone and the petitioner through video conferencing. As directed by CIC, the petitioner filed written submission. The CIC directed the CPIO of the Petitioner to provide complete information in relation to queries 1 2 and 3 of the original application of the Respondent before 15.12.2011. 12. In Transfer Case No. 96 of 2015, the Respondent sought following information from the CPIO of RBI under the Act of 2005, reply to which is tabulated hereunder:- Sl. No. Information Sought Reply 1. Before the Orissa High Court RBI has filed an affidavit stating that the total mark to market losses on account of currency derivatives is to the tune of more than ₹ 32,000 crores Please give bank wise breakup of the MTM Losses The Information sought by you is exempted under Section 8(1)(a) (e) of RTI Act, which state as under; 8(1) notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, there shall be no obligation to give any citizen (a) information disclosure of which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... under the RTI Act, 2005 which was received by us on 06th May, 2011. In this connection, we advise that the questions put forth by you relate to the observations made in the Inspection Report of NABARD pertaining to MSCB which are confidential in nature. Since furnishing the information would impede the process of investigation or apprehension or prosecution of offenders, disclosure of the same is exempted under Section 8(1)(h) of the Act. 15. In Transfer Case No. 98 of 2015, the Respondent sought following information from the CPIO of RBI under the Act of 2005, reply to which is tabulated hereunder:- Sl. No. Information Sought Reply 1. What contraventions and violations were made by SCB in respect of RBI instructions on derivatives for which RBI has imposed penalty of INR 10 lakhs on SCB in exercise of its powers vested under Section 47(1)(b) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 and as stated in the RBI press release dated April 26, 2011 issued by Department of Communications RBI The bank was penalized along with 18 other banks for contravention of various i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ers file notings and/or any information on the investigations conducted by RBI against SCB in respect of non-compliance by SCB thereby establishing violations by SCBV in respect of non compliances of RBI instructions on derivatives. Please also provide the above information in the following format. . Brief violations/contraventions made by SCB . In brief SCB replies/defense/explanation against each violations/contraventions made by it under the show cause notice. . RBI investigations/notes/on the SCB Replies/defense/explanations for each of the violation/contravention made by SCB. . RBI remarks/findings with regard to the violations/contraventions made by SCB. 16. In Transfer Case No. 99 of 2015, the Respondent sought following information from the CPIO of RBI under the Act of 2005, reply to which is tabulated hereunder:- Sl. No. Information Sought Reply 1. That, what action has the department taken against scams/financial irregularities of United Mercantile Cooperative Bank Ltd as mentioned in the enclosed published news ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ndings recorded in inspection which are based on information/documents obtained in a fiduciary capacity and cannot be disclosed to outsiders. The CPIO, UBD has stated that the same is exempted under Section 8(1)(e) of RTI Act. Apart from the fact that information sought by the appellant is sensitive and cannot be disclosed, it could also harm the competitive position of the co-operative bank. Therefore, exemption from disclosure of the Information is available under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act. 19. In Transfer Case No. 101 of 2015, with regard to Deendayal Nagri Shakari Bank Ltd, District Beed, the Respondent sought following information from the CPIO of RBI under the Act of 2005, reply to which is tabulated hereunder:- Sl. No. Information Sought Reply 1. Copies of complaints received by RBI against illegal working of the said bank, including violations of the Standing Orders of RBI as well as the provisions under Section 295 of the Companies Act, 1956. Disclosure of information regarding complaints received from third parties would harm the competitive position of a t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons pending before different High Courts. On 30.5.2015, while allowing the transfer petitions filed by Reserve Bank of India seeking transfer of various writ petitions filed by it in the High Courts of Delhi and Bombay, this Court passed the following orders: Notice is served upon the substantial number of respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection if Writ Petition Nos. 8400 of 2011, 8605 of 2011, 8693 of 2011, 8583 of 2011, 32 of 2012, 685 of 2012, 263 of 2012 and 1976 of 2012 pending in the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi and Writ Petition (L) Nos. 2556 of 2011, 2798 of 2011 and 4897 of 2011 pending in the High Court of Bombay are transferred to this Court and be heard together. In the meanwhile, the steps may be taken to serve upon the unserved respondents. Accordingly, the transfer petitions are allowed and the above mentioned writ petitions are withdrawn to this Court. The High Court of Delhi and the High Court of Bombay are directed to remit the entire record of the said writ petitions to this Court within four weeks. 22. Mr. T.R. Andhyarujina, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner-Reserve Bank of India, assailed the impugned ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... on of Reserve Bank of India. Learned Counsel also referred to the decision in the case of Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Limited and Another Vs. Reserve Bank of India, 1992 Vol. 2 SCC 343 and contended that Courts are not to interfere with the economic policy which is a function of the experts. V) That the RBI is vested with the responsibility of regulation and supervision of the banking system. As part of its supervisory role, RBI supervises and monitors the banks under its jurisdiction through on-site inspection conducted on annual basis under the statutory powers derived by it under section 35 of the Banking Regulation Act 1949, off-site returns on key financial parameters and engaging banks in dialogue through periodical meetings. RBI may take supervisory actions where warranted for violations of its guidelines/directives. The supervisory actions would depend on the seriousness of the offence, systemic implications and may range from imposition of penalty, to issue of strictures or letters of warning. While RBI recognizes and promotes enhanced transparency in banks disclosures to the public, as transparency strengthens market discipline, a bank may not be able t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ught for is sensitive from the point of adverse market reaction leading to systematic crisis for financial stability. 25. Learned senior counsel put heavy reliance on the Full Bench decision of the Central Information Commissioner and submitted that while passing the impugned order, the Central Information Commissioner completely overlooked the Full Bench decision and ignored the same. According to the learned counsel, the Bench, which passed the impugned order, is bound to follow the Full Bench decision. The Commission also erred in holding that the Full Bench decision is per incuriam as the Full Bench has not considered the statutory provisions of Section 8 (2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005. 26. Learned senior counsel also submitted that the Commission erred in holding that even if the information sought for is exempted under Section 8(1) (a), (d) or (e) of the Right to Information Act, Section 8(2) of the RTI Act would mandate the disclosure of the information. 27. Learned senior counsel further submitted that the basic question of law is whether the Right to Information Act, 2005 overrides various provisions of special statutes which confer confidentiality in t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 70. 33. The Right to Information Act, 2005 is a general provision which cannot override specific provisions relating to confidentiality in earlier legislation in accordance with the principle that where there are general words in a later statute it cannot be held that the earlier statutes are repealed altered or discarded. 34. Learned counsel submitted that Section 22 of the Right to Information Act, 2005 cannot have the effect of nullifying and repealing earlier statutes in relation to confidentiality. This has been well settled by this Court in a) Raghunath vs. state of Karnataka 1992(1) SCC 335 at p.348 pages 112 and 114 b) ICICI Bank vs. SIDCO Leather etc., 2006(10) SCC 452 at p. 466, paras 36 37 c) Central Bank vs. Kerala, 2009 (4) SCC 94 at p. 132-133 para 104 d) AG Varadharajalu vs. Tamil Nadu, 1998 (4) SCC 231 at p. 236 para 16. Hence, the Right to Information Act, 2005 cannot override the provisions for confidentiality conferred on the RBI by the earlier statutes referred to above. 35. The Preamble of the RTI Act, 2005 itself recognizes the fact that since the revealing of certain information is likely to conflict with other public interests like ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hushan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents in Transfer Case Nos.94 95 of 2015, began his arguments by referring the Preamble of the Constitution and submitted that through the Constitution it is the people who have created legislatures, executives and the judiciary to exercise such duties and functions as laid down in the constitution itself. 39. The right to information regarding the functioning of public institutions is a fundamental right as enshrined in Article 19 of the Constitution of India. This Hon ble Court has declared in a plethora of cases that the most important value for the functioning of a healthy and well informed democracy is transparency. Mr. Bhushan referred Constitution Bench judgment of this Court in the case of State of U.P. vs. Raj Narain, AIR 1975 SC 865, and submitted that it is a Government s responsibility like ours, where all the agents of the public must be responsible for their conduct, there can be but few secrets. The people of this country have a right to know every public act, everything that is done in a public way, by their functionaries. The right to know, which is derived from the concept of freedom of speech, though not absolu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... l throughout and is a natural right flowing from the concept of democracy (Para 56). Thereafter, legislation was passed amending the Representation of People Act, 1951 that candidates need not provide such information. This Court in the case of PUCL vs. Union of India, (2003) 4 SCC 399, struck down that legislation by stating: It should be properly understood that the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution such as, right to equality and freedoms have no fixed contents. From time to time, this Court has filled in the skeleton with soul and blood and made it vibrant. Since the last more than 50 years, this Court has interpreted Articles 14, 19 and 21 and given meaning and colour so that the nation can have a truly republic democratic society. 42. The RTI Act, 2005, as noted in its very preamble, does not create any new right but only provides machinery to effectuate the fundamental right to information. The institution of the CIC and the SICs are part of that machinery. The preamble also inter-alia states democracy requires an informed citizenry and transparency of information which are vital to its functioning and also to contain corruption and to hold Governments ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the scope of Section 8(1)(e) of the RTI Act has been decided by this Court in Central Board of Secondary Education vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay, (2011) 8 SCC 497, wherein, while rejecting the argument that CBSE acts in a fiduciary capacity to the students, it was held that: In a philosophical and very wide sense, examining bodies can be said to act in a fiduciary capacity, with reference to students who participate in an examination, as a Government does while governing its citizens or as the present generation does with reference to the future generation while preserving the environment. But the word information available to a person in his fiduciary relationship are used in Section 8(1) (e) of the RTI Act in its normal and well recognized sense, that is to refer to persons who act in a fiduciary capacity, with reference to specific beneficiary or beneficiaries who are to be expected to be protected or benefited by the action of the fiduciary. 47. We have extensively heard all the counsels appearing for the petitioner Banks and respondents and examined the law and the facts. 48. While introducing the Right to Information Bill, 2004 a serious debate and discussion took pla ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y years. There is another aspect about which information is to be made public. We had a lengthy discussion and it is correctly provided in the amendment under clause 8 of the Bill. The following information shall be exempted from disclosure which would prejudicially affect the sovereignty and integrity of India; which has been expressly forbidden; which may result in a breach of privileges of Parliament or the Legislature; and also information pertaining to defence matters. They are listed in clause 8 (a) to (g). There are exceptions to this clause. Where it is considered necessary that the information will be divulged in the interest of the State, that will be done. There must be transparency in public life. There must be transparency in administration and people must have a right to know what has actually transpired in the secretariat of the State as well as the Union Ministry. A citizen will have a right because it will be safe to prevent corruption. Many things are done behind the curtain. Many shoddy deals take place in the secretariats of the Central and State Governments and the information will always be kept hidden. Such practice should not be allowed in a democratic co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y to harmonise these conflicting interest while preserving the paramountcy of the democratic ideal; NOW, THEREFORE, it is expedient to provide for furnishing certain information to citizens who desire to have it. 51. Section 2 of the Act defines various authorities and the words. Section 2(j) defines right to information as under :- 2(j) right to information means the right to information accessible under this Act which is held by or under the control of any public authority and includes the right to- (i) inspection of work, documents, records; (ii) taking notes, extracts, or certified copies of documents or records; (iii) taking certified samples of material; (iv) obtaining information in the form of diskettes, floppies, tapes, video cassettes or in any other electronic mode or through printouts where such information is stored in a computer or in any other device; 52. Section 3 provides that all citizens shall have the right to information subject to the provisions of this Act. Section 4 makes it obligatory on all public authorities to maintain records in the manner provided therein. According to Section 6, a person who desires to obtain any informati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Secretaries and other officers: Provided that the decisions of Council of Ministers, the reasons thereof, and the material on the basis of which the decisions were taken shall be made public after the decision has been taken, and the matter is complete, or over: Provided further that those matters which come under the exemptions specified in this section shall not be disclosed; (j) information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has not relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest justifies the disclosure of such information: Provided that the information, which cannot be denied to the Parliament or a State Legislature shall not be denied to any person. (2) Notwithstanding anything in the Official Secrets Act, 1923 (19 of 1923) nor any of the exemptions permissible in accordance with sub-section (1), a public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... o profit rule- a fiduciary must not profit from his position at the expense of his customer, the beneficiary; (iii) Undivided loyalty rule- a fiduciary owes undivided loyalty to the beneficiary, not to place himself in a position where his duty towards one person conflicts with a duty that he owes to another customer. A consequence of this duty is that a fiduciary must make available to a customer all the information that is relevant to the customer s affairs (iv) Duty of confidentiality- a fiduciary must only use information obtained in confidence and must not use it for his own advantage, or for the benefit of another person. 57. The term fiduciary relationship has been well discussed by this Court in the case of Central Board of Secondary Education and Anr. vs. Aditya Bandopadhyay and Ors. (supra). In the said decision, their Lordships referred various authorities to ascertain the meaning of the term fiduciary relationship and observed thus:- 20.1) Black s Law Dictionary (7th Edition, Page 640) defines fiduciary relationship thus: A relationship in which one person is under a duty to act for the benefit of the other on matters within the scope of the relatio ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Words and Phrases, Permanent Edition (Vol. 16A, Page 41) defines fiducial relation thus : There is a technical distinction between a fiducial relation which is more correctly applicable to legal relationships between parties, such as guardian and ward, administrator and heirs, and other similar relationships, and confidential relation which includes the legal relationships, and also every other relationship wherein confidence is rightly reposed and is exercised. Generally, the term fiduciary applies to any person who occupies a position of peculiar confidence towards another. It refers to integrity and fidelity. It contemplates fair dealing and good faith, rather than legal obligation, as the basis of the transaction. The term includes those informal relations which exist whenever one party trusts and relies upon another, as well as technical fiduciary relations. 20.4) In Bristol and West Building Society vs. Mothew [1998 Ch. 1] the term fiduciary was defined thus : A fiduciary is someone who has undertaken to act for and on behalf of another in a particular matter in circumstances which give rise to a relationship of trust and confidence. The distinguishing ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to the employer in the course of his employment, is expected to act as a fiduciary and cannot disclose it to others. Similarly, if on the request of the employer or official superior or the head of a department, an employee furnishes his personal details and information, to be retained in confidence, the employer, the official superior or departmental head is expected to hold such personal information in confidence as a fiduciary, to be made use of or disclosed only if the employee s conduct or acts are found to be prejudicial to the employer. 58. In the instant case, the RBI does not place itself in a fiduciary relationship with the Financial institutions (though, in word it puts itself to be in that position) because, the reports of the inspections, statements of the bank, information related to the business obtained by the RBI are not under the pretext of confidence or trust. In this case neither the RBI nor the Banks act in the interest of each other. By attaching an additional fiduciary label to the statutory duty, the Regulatory authorities have intentionally or unintentionally created an in terrorem effect. 59. RBI is a statutory body set up by the RBI Act as India ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation/ duty cannot be considered to come under the purview of being shared in fiduciary relationship. One of the main characteristic of a Fiduciary relationship is Trust and Confidence . Something that RBI and the Banks lack between them. 63. In the present case, we have to weigh between the public interest and fiduciary relationship (which is being shared between the RBI and the Banks). Since, RTI Act is enacted to empower the common people, the test to determine limits of Section 8 of RTI Act is whether giving information to the general public would be detrimental to the economic interests of the country? To what extent the public should be allowed to get information? 64. In the context of above questions, it had long since come to our attention that the Public Information Officers (PIO) under the guise of one of the exceptions given under Section 8 of RTI Act, have evaded the general public from getting their hands on the rightful information that they are entitled to. 65. And in this case the RBI and the Banks have sidestepped the General public s demand to give the requisite information on the pretext of Fiduciary relationship and Economic Interest . This attitud ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he RBI cannot be put in a fix, by making it accountable to every action taken by it. However, in the instant case the RBI is accountable and as such it has to provide information to the information seekers under Section 10(1) of the RTI Act, which reads as under: Section 10(1) Severability -Where a request for access to information is rejected on the ground that it is in relation to information which is exempt from disclosure, then, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, access may be provided to that part of the record which does not contain any information which is exempt from disclosure under this Act and which can reasonably be severed from any part that contains exempt information. 72. It was also contended by learned senior counsel for the RBI that disclosure of information sought for will also go against the economic interest of the nation. The submission is wholly misconceived. 73. Economic interest of a nation in most common parlance are the goals which a nation wants to attain to fulfil its national objectives. It is the part of our national interest, meaning thereby national interest can t be seen with the spectacles(glasses) devoid of economic inter ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cience and technology and global economy. It has to be understood that rights can be enjoyed without any inhibition only when they are nurtured within protective boundaries. Any excessive use of these rights which may lead to tampering these boundaries will not further the national interest. And when it comes to national economic interest, disclosure of information about currency or exchange rates, interest rates, taxes, the regulation or supervision of banking, insurance and other financial institutions, proposals for expenditure or borrowing and foreign investment could in some cases harm the national economy, particularly if released prematurely. However, lower level economic and financial information, like contracts and departmental budgets should not be withheld under this exemption. This makes it necessary to think when or at what stage an information is to be provided i.e., the appropriate time of providing the information which will depend on nature of information sought for and the consequences it will lead to after coming in public domain. 77. In one of the case, the respondent S.S. Vohra sought certain information in relation to the Patna Branch of ICICI Bank and advi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t overnight in any system and one can hope to witness accountability in a system only when its end users are well-educated, well-informed and well-aware. If the customers of commercial banks will remain oblivious to the violations of RBI Guidelines and standards which such banks regularly commit, then eventually the whole financial system of the country would be at a monumental loss. This can only be prevented by suo motu disclosure of such information as the penalty orders are already in public domain. 78. Similarly, in another case the respondent Jayantilal N. Mistry sought information from the CPIO, RBI in respect of a Cooperative Bank viz. Saraspur Nagrik Sahkari Bank Limited related to inspection report, which was denied by the CPIO on the ground that the information contained therein were received by RBI in a fiduciary capacity and are exempt under Section 8(1)(e) of RTI Act. The CIC directed the petitioner to furnish that information since the RBI expressed their willingness to disclose a summary of substantive part of the inspection report to the respondent. While disposing of the appeal the CIC observed:- Before parting with this appeal, we would like to record our ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... fraud on public funds. There is no doubt that information regarding top industrialists who have defaulted in repayment of loans must be brought to citizens knowledge; there is certainly a larger public interest that could be served on .disclosure of the same. In fact, information about industrialists who are loan defaulters of the country may put pressure on such persons to pay their dues. This would have the impact of alerting Citizens about those who are defaulting in payments and could also have some impact in shaming them. RBI had by its Circular DBOD No. BC/CIS/47/20.16.002/94 dated April 23, 1994 directed all banks to send a report on their defaulters, which it would share with all banks and financial institutions, with the following objectives: 1) To alert banks and financial institutions (FIs) and to put them on guard against borrowers who have defaulted in their dues to lending institutions; 2) To make public the names of the borrowers who have defaulted and against whom suits have been filed by banks/ FIs. 80. At this juncture, we may refer the decision of this Court in Mardia Chemicals Limited vs. Union of India, (2004) 4 SCC 311, wherein this court while ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
