Tax Management India. Com
                        Law and Practice: A Digital eBook ...

Category of Documents

TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals SMS News Articles
Highlights
D. Forum
What's New

Share:      

        Home        
 

TMI Blog

Home List
← Previous Next →

2018 (10) TMI 731

y the assessee at the prescribed rate was disallowed - Held that:- disallowance of depreciation claim by the assessee u/s 32 of the Act qua trademark acquired in FY 2006-07 is not sustainable as the TPO is not to decide the business expediency of any intangible assets purchased by the assessee by sitting on the armchair of a businessman. Moreover, when the decision rendered by the TPO for AY 2007-08 has been set aside by the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal to the TPO, the present assessment order passed by following the said order is also not sustainable. - Matter remanded back to the TPO/AO to decide afresh after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee - ITA No.5316/Del./2015 - 8-10-2018 - SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL M .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

.03.2013 ITA No. 48/2011-12 for the A. Y. 2007-08 held that the transactions of purchase of trademark was not at arm's length and the order passed by the Transfer Pricing Officer with regard to the purchase of the trademark was upheld. The appellant had capitalized the purchase of the trademark and claimed the depreciation. The value of the international transaction involving the purchase of the trademark was held at "Nil". In view of this, the Assessing Officer is justified in rejecting the claim of the depreciation during the year. The ground of appeal raised by the appellant is therefore, dismissed. " 2. That on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon'ble CIT(A) has erred in dismissing the groun .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

TPO order dated 15.10.2010 passed in AY 2007-08. It is also not in dispute that the assessee has claimed depreciation @ 25% @ WDV of the trademark amounting to ₹ 5,29,82,100/-. 6. At the very outset, it is brought to our notice by the ld. AR for the assessee that the issue in controversy has already been decided in favour of the assessee by the coordinate Bench of the Tribunal vide order dated 13.06.2016 passed in its own case ITA Nos.2244/Del/2013 & 2245/Del/2013 for AYs 2007-08 & 2009-10 and drew our attention towards para 23 at page 37 of the order (supra), operative para 23 thereof is extracted as under :- 23. Therefore, on an overall consideration of the facts of the case and the judicial precedents available, it is our c .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

any evidence on record to reject the payment made to Fab India Inc. In the instant case, the TPO did not examine the arms length price of the impugned royalty payment in accordance with the provisions of Sec.92C of the Act. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the ALP of the impugned payment for trademark and the issue relating to the depreciation on trade mark need to be examined afresh. Accordingly we set aside the order of Assessing Officer/TPO/CIT (A) on this issue and restore the same to the file of the TPO for examination of the same afresh in accordance with the law, after affording necessary opportunity of being heard. In the result, Ground nos. 1 & 2 of the assessee s appeal are allowed for statistical purposes. 7. Bare peru .....

X X X X X X X

Full Text of the Document

X X X X X X X

 

 

← Previous Next →

 

 

|| Home || About us || Feedback || Contact us || Disclaimer || Terms of Use || Privacy Policy || Database || Members || Refer Us ||

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.
|| Blog || Site Map - Recent || Site Map ||